>>17904388
You're confusing raw totals with percentages of servicemen killed or wounded in combat
The Russian empires deaths as a percentage of their population in WWI was under 2% which is lower than the US's total population/war deaths in the Civil War
Im detecting this attitude in your post and another one in this thread where you seem to be under the impression that wars in the 1700s and 1800s were tea parties interrupted by inaccurate musket fire and nothing could be further from the truth
Look at the picture, both Germany's and Italy's casualties as a percentage of their servicemen in the field is about in line with America's in the Mexican American War
You insistence that WWI was #UNPRECEDENTED is extra funny in the light of most historians of European history being of the opinion that the 1914 - 1918 isn't, in actuality, the first world war, there's debate on this ofc but most consider either the seven years war or the war of the austrian succession to be the real first 'World War'