>>513004325
that's not an argument let alone a valid response
did he seriously just destroy your half-baked philosophy by pointing out your hypocritical double standard?
What a shit bunch of ideas you're clinging too.
Since they've been shown to be fallacious, and since you have no valid response, what will you do now?
Either:
>re-evaluate your beliefs and ideas, becoming a more rounded and mature individual
or
>double down on shitty broken ideas like a low IQ religious idealogue
If you're religious, I already know which path you will take, funny that.
