>>5583
You mean like for a normal report, a warn telling them in essence "that wasn't an actionable post, stop that"? I've thought about this and, sometimes, very much want such a function if say some guy is reporting every single post in a valid thread, flooding the queue.

However, on the flip side it is too transparent a response to give unambiguous feedback on non-actionable posts. There are some things that are obvious to warn for as frivolous reporting, but some boards may have grey areas, and such a function could be instrumental in helping users map out the individual temperaments of various mods/jans at various points of the day, by spamming reports at those posts and using the presence/absence of a frivolous report warn as proof positive of differences aka inconsistencies aka exactly what they should not be aware of or trying to scope out.

Right now, if nothing happens to a post, people aren't sure whether it's because the jan/mods don't care or if no one's looked at the queue. I recall reading a study showing that when there are big pictures of eyes in a room, students are less likely to cheat. Meaning, even if in fact no jan/mod has checked out the queue lately, they still feel they're being watched. Giving a direct warn feedback about regular posts is a more direct "yes, someone's here" response than just leaving regular posts up because we cleared the reports.