THIS PICTURE IS SCREAMING VOLUMES RIGHT INTO MY SOVL AT THIS VERY MOMENT IN THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM

>>149538158 (OP)
Kek

>>149539346
>kek
God damn fucking right. And yet, in the same breath, you'll STILL say Germans have no humour. Fuck you, you burger piece of shit.

very good hans very good, however;

>>149546682
However what?

>>149546682
however what retard?

>>149538158 (OP)
Aber warum französisch?

>>149555042
if you think have better VOLUMES, post them

Volumina!

>germans on their welfare high be like

What is the maximum volume in terms of speaking?

>>149556281
In my company? 4 million trades

>>149556493
>>149556281
Never mind I misread

I'm getting strong Bavarian vibes from this thread...

the country with the most educated, intelligent, nobel prize winners, inventors, composers, and overall contributions to mankind, one day out of nowhere, decided to hate jews for no reason at all.

something is not adding up here

>>149556281
> What is the maximum volume in terms of speaking?


The observable universe, which is the portion we can see, has a volume of approximately 4.22 x 10^5 Gly3 (4.22 x 10^80 cubic meters). This corresponds to a sphere with a diameter of about 93 billion light-years. However, the total volume of the entire universe, including the unobservable portion, is unknown and may even be infinite

>>149556281
you're mom lmao

>>149556281
this image speaks volumes to the maximum possible 1x10^3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

>>149538158 (OP)
Always wondered why volume of cone is 1/3 of volume of same dimensional cylinder. Not 1/2.

I just got back from Austria and somehow they have a worse sense of humor than the Germans. I guess it’s expected from the country of Hitler and Josef Fritzl.

>>149562218
Kek based

>>149538158 (OP)
Volumes are fraudulent however
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach%E2%80%93Tarski_paradox

>>149564380
>set theory
>>>/x/

>>149563399
Volume is three dimensional, which is why. You're visusalising them in 2D (area) which is perhaps why you're confused.
Your exact question here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/623/why-is-the-volume-of-a-cone-one-third-of-the-volume-of-a-cylinder

>>149562262
>may even be infinite
Holy shit that post SPEAKS FUCKING VOLUMES

>>149562141
stop reducing us to literally the worst Bundesstaat

>>149572461
Bayern ist ein Freistaat, merci danke nochamals.

>>149538158 (OP)
>paralelalelilolu

>>149563399
∫ ∫ 2πr dr dx for x from 0 to h for r from 0 to xR/h
∫ [(2π(xR/h)2/2) - (2π02/2)] dx for x from 0 to h
∫ πR2x2/(h2) dx for x from 0 to h
πR2h3/(3h2) - πR203/(3h2)
πR2h/3

Where R is the radius at the base and h is the height of the cone.
Radius at a given height of the cone is rR/h because of similar triangles (h/R = x/r)
2πr is of course the circumference at a given radius.

>>149573902
I just noticed this is unreadable because 4chan posting forces superscript numbers into normal numbers.

∫ ∫ 2πr dr dx for x from 0 to h for r from 0 to xR/h
∫ {(2π([xR/h]^2)/2) - (2π0^2/2)} dx for x from 0 to h
∫ π(R^2)(x^2)/(h^2) dx for x from 0 to h
π(R^2)(h^3)/(3h^2) - π(R^2)(0^3)/(3h^2)
π(R^2)h/3

>>149573902
>>149573998
>this wasted degree autism
Egyptians and greeks figured out all these volumetric formulas and didn’t even know of differential calculus.
I hope you feel really stupid and replaceable by AI.

>>149575827
You're acting like a lot of effort went into this. I used calculus precisely because it makes things easier, the ancient mathematicians would have also jumped on the opportunity to use it.
>I hope you feel really stupid and replaceable by AI.
My work is making those AIs dumdum.

>>149580482
how much do you earn Morita? also, do you have a gf?

>>149580611
Enough to be comfortable. And I used to live with my gf of 3 years but since we broke up I haven't felt like dating.