>>149639895>you try to sound deepgrim, heard this one before trying hard to help somebody in need, very sad, please read the material and take your own conclusions then.
>practicality and beautythe bridge i drawn between practicalities here is that this one is sublime (and it touches, while beauty charms) and should come first with the correct frame of mind, it wont fade in the face of age like the charms of beauty which already posseses a deceptive nature.
>height (?)great heights are sublime like great depths, but i think youre looking to height thoughout spectrum of sexual attraction here which honestly are very subjectve; a tall women can find a short men attractive, schopenhauer goes as far as saying that theyll complement each other, and thats the correct order – maybe that goes with the previously mentioned modern societietal frame (pressure, expections) of adopting the feminie frame of mind and puttings the deceptive charms first.
>>149642398i wouldnt count with that; hair or bald, tall or short, eventually, you will cease to be attractive, and i qoute Kant: "In the end, age, the great ravager of beauty, threatens all of these charms, and in the natural order of things the sublime and noble qualities must gradually take the place of the beautiful ones in order to make a person worthy of ever greater respect as she ceases to be attractive"