>>149884059 (OP)FIFA and Blatter specifically simply wanted an African nation to host the World Cup for the first time. It was supposed to be good PR and a sign of respect for Africa as a whole (if you're generous and willing to assume FIFA didn't only have their own ego in mind)
They didn't really want Egypt or Morocco or Algeria, but a "black" nation. South Africa beats Nigeria when it comes to overall wealth, infrastructure (partially because of their rugby and cricket traditions), and internal stability. The climate was also judged to be more pleasant, I guess. It had to be South Africa. Nothing strange about it once FIFA's ambition comes into play
It was a decent World Cup. Not perfectly organized, but in the end, everything went well. And the fans were passionate and memorable for sure. A nice change of pace. No other sub-Saharan country is capable of hosting