>>95869233 (OP)Depends on how they're implemented.
Frankly I'm not a huge fan of the noble savage archetype, because the overwhelming majority of attempts at portraying primitive warrior cultures never properly address their "might makes right" elements less palatable to modern values, and come off as not entirely genuine because of it; something more like a greenskinned Iliad might have potential.
Races that are innately evil don't have as much potential to be interesting either (demons etc get a pass because it's kind of their thing), but they're a lot harder to fuck up, and I'd much prefer it over a hamfisted attempt at moral complexity.
>>95869873Personally, the direction I've settled on has been to lean into the OG Tolkien portrayal of the average orc as trapped in a giant institutionalized cycle of abuse; Russian military (and to an extent prison) culture has been a surprisingly good source of information on how to represent this.
They're ultimately victims, but in the same way that a rabid dog is, as something that can only be sympathized with from a safe distance. It's possible for them to be rehabilitated, not in the sense of "aww he's just misunderstood (:" but through their own internal struggle to recognize that there is an alternative and to then break the cycle.
Some orcs in small isolated enclaves have managed to stay independent from the horde, even if only by not being notable enough to draw attention; while otherwise far closer to their "natural" way of life, they are violently insular and isolationist, because their entire experience with outsiders has been overwhelmingly negative (both their own kind in the horde, and others who have likewise had overwhelmingly negative experience with orcs for the same reason), and they quite understandably just want to be left the fuck alone.