>>95900607The Freak is fucking terrifying. Unironically the single scariest person in the setting.
Feel free to yell "urrh woke didn't read" at me.
From a magical perspective, the world is split down gender lines. There have always been societal roles that are a) gender-locked and b) mystical.
Wise women, old sages, high priests, the village witch, your midwife grandma who understands childbirth like nobody else within a 50 mile radius, the warrior-hero whose quest ends with symbolically fucking the country's collective hole.
There have always been kinds of magic in mythology that are only the domain of men OR of women, not both. There have often been specific named mythic figures who are taught these things as a one-off. IIRC Odin is one of them.
In unknown armies, there are two kinds of magic. There's Adept magic, the sort that comes from holding a paradoxical worldview, like the above mentioned videomancers (finding union with others in watching TV alone) or entropomancers (feeling like you have power by taking risks) or epideromancers (rule the self by harming the self). Then there's avatars, who walk a path that other humans have trod over and over and over until we collectively recognise an archetype. Protective, loving Mother. Wandering Masterless Man. Bargain-making, letter-of-his-word Merchant. The harmless yet impactful Fool.
Among these, in UA 1st/2nd edition, was the Mystic Hermaphrodite - someone who represents and embraces the paradoxical nature of magic, of opposites being brought together, as well as the common (in older generations) nature of specific kinds of magic as a gendered occupation.
Under most circumstances, being both an Avatar and an Adept is impossible, especially at a high level of power. Avatars are submitting to the collective unconscious paradigm of How Things Work, while Adepts draw power from believing in a worldview other than that - it's like being a hard atheist and a true believing mormon at the same time.