I can't wait for the amount of butthurt this game is gonna cause on release day

>>95938814 (OP)
I don’t know what this is but it looks like even shittier Starcraft

>>95938829
That's because the only marketing they could afford is transparent unpaid ads like OP.

>>95938829
then you know precisely what this is, my friend!

>>95938814 (OP)
I think I could fuck up rat guy there.

>>95938814 (OP)
>>>/ic/ is that way friend. You can also post your digital art montage in any of the art or a related world building or lore thread, although I'd advise you to keep at least a minimum standard. Photo shopping unrelated artworks from different artists into one picture with no connection is bad form though.

>>95938814 (OP)
So the Envoy and the Rat remained from the original iconics?

>>95938844
If they really wanted to advertise they should at least do the bare minimum and put the name in the filename.

>>95939245
I'm pretty sure this game is called Concord.
I'm pretty sure it's also already dead.

>>95938814 (OP)
What's this supposed to be?

> /tg/ trying to mask there anger by pretending they don't know what starfinder is

Lmao

>>95939327
Oh, thank you for naming it.

>>95939327
No, I genuinely don't know what Starfinder is.

>>95939327
Only heard of it once. So is this art from a new edition or something?

>>95939327
I knew it exists, yet I have no idea what alien races are in that game, nor does any of the ones in the OP look recognisable. If OP hadn't shopped artoworks from several artists into one picture this would be generic space opera slop.

>>95939344
>>95939407
>>95939423
>>95939440
>Seething

>>95938814 (OP)
What is it? I'm already not a fan of the furry races.

>>95939327
Starfinder isn’t just Pathfinder with space ships?

>>95939457
Anon, I was serious, I'd only heard of Starfinder once. Are you okay? Are you on your medication?

>>95939494
He's trolling.

>>95939327
Reverse image search shows nothing and Starfinder is mostly famous for being a flop. Itch and dtrpg are filled with failed systems, why should I recognize any of them?

>>95939501
I give it a 50/50 on trolling and being schizo, given it's /tg/

>>95939327
I was an enormous shill for Starfinder back when Paizo Games General was Pathfinder General. I bought Against the Swarm solely so people can have it on the archive.

But I don’t give a damn anymore because nobody wants to play it.

>>95939506
>Starfinder is mostly famous for being a flop.

/tg/ is so disconnected from reality

>>95939327
It's like Rogue Trader but d20 instead of d100.

One of the worst troll threads of late.

Anyway, picrel is one of my favorite images. This game is poo. I find Paizo's weird obsession with level scaling and MMO balancing is a lot harder to stomach in a scifi game for some reason.

>>95939542
Post sales

>>95939642
You're the one making the claim it's a flop

>>95939567
Sci Fi games should lean towards leveling out your character then leveling up

>>95939327
That image is so generic that it could have been anything. Actually it still could be anything, I'm not going to go bother checking.

>>95939754
Thanks for proving my point.

>>95938814 (OP)
This obscure advertising technique you are using, instead of generating my interest, has instead annoyed me, so I will put this product (whatever it is) on my "DO NOT BUY" list. And no, I will not be discussing it with my friends later.

You have failed as an advertiser and should be ashamed of yourself.

>>95941615
You know, if you dislike a thread, but want to voice your dislike, there's a nifty little option you could pick instead of bumping it, like a faggot.

I think this site severely over estimated how much companies care to advertise on here especially when it comes to /tg/

>>95938814 (OP)
the bug eyed thing with the pink dress looks stupid as fuck
the rest of them look just kind of generic. I like the rat.

>>95939327
>release day
Hasn't Starfinder been out for a few years already?

>>95942735
Second edition comes out during gencon

>>95942735
It's probably 2e-based unlike the first one
The first one sucks balls so why wouldn't this one though

>>95938814 (OP)
Starfinder has a new edition

>>95938814 (OP)
From the comment, it appears this is Starfinder, which is the scifi version of Pathfinder, right? And Pathfinder is the clone of 3.xpf? I've never played it 'cuz I hated 3.xpf. But if I had enjoyed it, this'd seem like a perfectly reasonable party of PCs, to me. Like... if Spelljammer leaned a little heavier on the scifi elements and you presented this as a PC party in it? Eh. Looks fine.

Genuinely funny that so few people care about Starfinder that even a deliberate bait thread intended to antagonize people into replying can't manage to garner interest.