>>215218536
>man is nothing else but what he makes of himself
Is that true? Because that's making a claim to objective truth. That's not nihilism.
>you're also confusing inherent meaning with constructed meaning
Yes, I did. But more importantly, the distinction doesn't matter. And the idea that you think it does means you don't understand that there is NO meaning in nihilism, including your own.
>you seek meaning from outside your own experience believing it exists,
No. I'm pointing out the inconsistencies with the idea you can make your own beliefs under nihilism. It is self-defeating. I never argued for any other belief system. You assumed.
>when in reality it's created by individuals through thought, emotions, culture, and possible more things
Once again, you've asserted a truism about the belief that individuals create meaning. You are ascribing meaning to individuals. Can you not understand why doesn't make sense if nothing in the universe has meaning.
>life is a subjective experience.
What you just wrote is an objective claim to truth. You are claiming objective truth. This is naked hypocrisy - one nihilists use because they can't function in the world under the actual definition of nihilism. So, they lie to themselves and say that their "meaning" that they created is inherently meaningful. This is Philosophy 101 and why no one takes nihilists seriously.
>there is no inherent meaning to anything but what we personally ascribe to it
Once again, your ascribing meaning to the consciousness of individuals.
There's literally no combination words I can say to make the point more simple and clear - if you believe nothing has meaning than neither does an individual or what they choose to be meaningful.
