Anonymous
6/12/2025, 3:51:51 PM No.712440065
This is where the Switch 2 went wrong.
Replies:
Thread 712440065 - /v/ [Archived: 1165 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 4:22:53 PM No.712442721
>>712440065 (OP)
>only company making GPUs worth a shit
>makes ARM SoCs
It's a no brainer if you want a portable, retard.
>only company making GPUs worth a shit
>makes ARM SoCs
It's a no brainer if you want a portable, retard.
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 4:23:45 PM No.712442778
>>712440065 (OP)
They need DLSS.
They need DLSS.
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 4:29:23 PM No.712443261
>>712440065 (OP)
The Switch 1 was already in full scale production by 2016 for a 2017 release. AMD at the time was in a horrific spot. AMD was also already supplying chips for the PS4/Xbox One, so I don't know if they even had the capacity to actually design and supply Nintendo with chips that meet their requirements. I also don't really know what AMD's SOC game was back in those times. Now, AMD is dominant in this field (excluding Apple of course who have the ARM world in a chokehold). I'm sure Nintendo would've been working with AMD now if they were working on a Switch 1. The reason they didn't switch to AMD for the Switch 2 probably has something to do with compatibility. Probably not worth it at that point to switch.
The Switch 1 was already in full scale production by 2016 for a 2017 release. AMD at the time was in a horrific spot. AMD was also already supplying chips for the PS4/Xbox One, so I don't know if they even had the capacity to actually design and supply Nintendo with chips that meet their requirements. I also don't really know what AMD's SOC game was back in those times. Now, AMD is dominant in this field (excluding Apple of course who have the ARM world in a chokehold). I'm sure Nintendo would've been working with AMD now if they were working on a Switch 1. The reason they didn't switch to AMD for the Switch 2 probably has something to do with compatibility. Probably not worth it at that point to switch.