>>712505171>I said it gets conflated with their writingMy mistake then, I clearly misinterpreted that.
>that it's very fucking easy to find examples ofFallout 3 was widely criticized for its main story by normies because the main story about water deliberately went out of its way to insist upon itself showing how nonsensical it is. It made everyone notice that everyone is getting on just fine with the existing water in the world & that only the hobos outside of the towns were the only people who seemed to give a shit about water quality.
It was also near universally hated for the retarded shit that happened in second half of the game when you encounter eden & the retarded ending. The writing was so hated they changed the ending so you weren't forced to an hero for literally no reason at all & the hatred of bethesdas bitter "the lone wanderer was too much of a coward to kys for no reason" narration was VERY commonplace.
In the case of fallout 4 you couldn't find a single living breathing person who would defend the writing in that game, not even a literal down syndrome retard would defend that because its so aggressively bad. Normies didn't complain about shauns motivations, how nonsensical the railroad was, shit like the kid in the fridge? Opposite day, seriously. The people who were indifferent to the writing in 3 hated 4s writing, they hated that the dialog was cut down to yes, yes, yes, maybe later, being railroaded & the plot holes.
If people did like the shroud quest though which I'd argue was actually good & if you're counting that then I'll gladly take the label of retarded normie. And maybe nicks character writing, I've seen people praise that but the writing in a general sense? Nothing but negativity.
This is insane revisionism to claim people liked this garbage.
Theres a lot of terrible designs in these games normies liked but somehow you picked the things people actually hated about the games as your argument.