>20 years later
>still the strongest cpu ever made

how did sony do it?

by their marketing department somehow convincing normies they are computer engineers.
my friend was one of them
but i was just head TA of the computer architecture class at a top university, so what do i know?

>>712511846 (OP)
alien technology

>>712511846 (OP)
This is total nonsense. The Cell processor the bane of the PS3, because it does not work like a genuine CPU. It is good for crunching numbers, but that is it.

It actually only has one CPU core and was otherwise designed more like a GPU, which is why it was notoriously difficult to program games for. This is why it was discontinued and also why we will never see anything like it ever again in the desktop space.

>>712511846 (OP)
>t.has no idea why the Cell is actually shit

It's in a server config and not a game but real-time RT almost 20 years ago is still pretty nuts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKqZKXwop5E

I still insist that it's the result of a time traveler who didn't really understand how computers worked.

>>712512719
Lol

>>712512719
>on a cluster of IBM QS20 Cell blades
>only information of it running a ps3 is it can render "interactive frames"
lol

north korea chips

>>712515408
>on a cluster of IBM QS20 Cell blades
I clarified that and so does the video.
>only information of it running a ps3 is it can render "interactive frames"
Retard is gloating that a console from 2006 doesn't compete with a $2000 GPU today. And yet, despite the lithography 7th gen devs might have us outclassed.

>>712517796
the cell was a piece of shit and no amount of cope will change this

>>712512329
nobody tell this nigga what CPUs do

>>712518023
Nope, the RSX was garbage and a lot of shit ports would rely 100% on it and not use the SPUs at all.