>Every week this piece of shit loses hundreds of players, at least 1k per month, despite the damn GENRE is based on people playing for hundreds of hours
>All the shills can muster as a defense is that everyone just went to the consoles, and it's okidoki the collapsing player count because consoles, consoles, it had a simultaneous launch in consoles and epic and everyone is on the consoles, just offscreen.

>>712628907 (OP)
Everyone knows Civ is not playable until the complete edition is released.
The day Civ 7 was announced, I immediately bought Civ 6.

>>712628907 (OP)
>i care how many people play a singleplayer game
???

>i play an unpatched civilization game
?????????
Civ4 couldn't even reliably save-load on launch lmao

Ban steam chart threads
>ugh.. sweatie can't you see it's not the same?
Yes it is. Cope

>>712629140
The single-player game that was made and remade to sell as many "civ packs" as possible. Let me put in this way as a retard can understand.
IF PEOPLE AREN'T PLAYING THE FUCKING GAME, THEY WON'T BUY THE DLC

>>712628907 (OP)
go woke go broke

>>712629625
Unironically the only true post in this thread

>>712628907 (OP)
>shill 7 on Civ 6's Steam announcements page and forum
>people shit on it, post locked shortly after
replacement of narrator to that hag from Gay of Groans / 2 line character from Rey Wars didn't help either

>Make Civ videos for years
>Get invited to try VII and to shill for it
>make an made a rage video about HOW MUCH HE IS NOT SHILL A GAME
>Stop making regular gameplay videos for months, just make a "WOW THE GAME IS SAVED" at every announced patch
>people aren't watching his VII videos because nobody cares about the games
>Goes into a spiralling depression because they can't make new videos of said game and make a living while doing so

>>712630086
>put all your eggs in one autistic basket
>lose
lmao

>>712629625
the ugly models have almost nothing to do with 7's failure, 6 is even worse and gets more players than 5
the problem is them fucking up the entire core gameplay of civ for literally no reason
you're not a single country now, you're just [leader] who progresses from [ancient civ] to [medieval civ] to [modern civ] (with some extra steps)
it's fucking asinine and hopefully the retard who signed off on it was executed

>>712630604
>not playing as Harriet Tubman of Egypt

>>712630086
>>712630382
It's funny, I looked at this guy's career and thought
>Damn, he picked a good game to make a career out of, there's no way that autists will ever get tired of Civilization, and there's no way Firaxis will fuck up the series

people know it's a massive fuckup of a launch and there has nothing major been done to recover the shitshow

>>712630604
They're at the point where they're just trying to make it fresh rather than prioritising quality

I think Civ7 looks worse than Civ6 visiually. Everything blends together with a weird mush

>>712631116
It's got higher graphically fidelity than 6, but you can't tell anything apart. I don't care if 6's color coded districts looked cartoon-y, it at least allowed you to decipher a city at a glance.

>>712630604
To be fair they had to change something.
They fucked it up but they could not deliver the same game again for a seventh time.
At least for 1- 5 you could say the graphics and tech improved, but 7 looks basically like 6 again.

>>712629402
>Let me put in this way as a retard can understand.
>IF PEOPLE AREN'T PLAYING THE FUCKING GAME, THEY WON'T BUY THE DLC
I don't care, I'm not a shareholder. I play the games. Fucking moron.

>>712628907 (OP)
What compels people to discuss bad video games all day

>>712630086
Imagine making a game so bad it drives your biggest shill into deppression

>>712632072
It's fun to poke roadkill with friends.

>>712628907 (OP)
yea at this point if it gets more than one expansion i'll be surprised, seems like a fundamental problem rather than just unpolished

>>712629013
civ6 is still bad even now

>>712629140
civ4 at least had good fundamentals at launch to iterate on