>>712822274>there has to be some system to it right?Not really, no. It evolved organically, then went through quite literally thousands of years of often entirely arbitrary reforms as the system (in such a massive and diverse country without modern communication infrastructure) tended to create local variants that needed to be put back in line by the occassional ambitious ruler that got the whole nation under control. Meaning: a lot of the reforms and changes simply reflects political vogues.
I can tell you one thing though: not all, not even most chinese characters are actually iconographs (e.g. based on original visual resemblance to an actual object).
Most of them are compounds, meaning a bunch of actual iconographs were smushed together, sometimes quite randomly.
For an example, notice that the symbol for cat, dog, pig and monkey start with the same thing (the left side of the symbol). It's actually a simplified version of this symbol: ็ฌ which means dog which you can understand the resemblance of, but became more general symbol for roughly mamalian species. The rest of the symbol specifies some other condition, like where it lives or what significance it would have.
So yeah, most of these symbols aren't supposed to be a picture of something specific, but a bunch of individual pictures that originally were depicting something, and that were later combined into one based on semiotic associations, rather than visual similarity to subject they represent.
This is also why / how you can get symbols for abstract things that don't have a visual representations.
Like say, for grief. Which I feel over knowing this shit and largely only putting into use in occassional 4chan posts.