Shouldn't any videogame with AI in it be public domain? How are these scammers able to trademark AI shit and sell it $70 a pop?

funny how now one knows the answer.

Just accept that you shoud be paying $70 for some AI generated shit, bro. Meanwhile you can't monitize AI and likely never will, since that's a can of worms and shit no one wants to deal with.

Derivative works

>>712920073
How does that work for AI if it cannot be copyrighted?

>>712919156 (OP)
Because IP law is just a grift for lawyers and NPEs. AI exposes significant quandaries when it comes to derivation and theft in the greater industry at a scale that - in non-AI media - can mostly be laughed off as coincidence or hidden behind closed doors.
They don't want to properly acknowledge how AI interacts with IP law, because they want to keep the lifetime duration of copyright, the 20 year duration of patents (in a time where paradigm shifts can occur every year lmao) and the indefinite duration of trademarks (need to be able to make money off of things in public domain lmao, ignore that this shit should have just been replaced with a hash value, since trademark nowadays mostly just facilitates industry fraud and passing off Chinkshit).

>>712921629
ok then, can I juse use Veo3 to make infinite content and be a millionaire?
I'm asking but I see there's already people doing this shit. It's all over Instagram and TikTok.

>>712919156 (OP)
Toxotransmosis moment.