It's time to put an end to the fake frames and fake resolutions

Devs can put even less effort into optimizing their games now and just let AI handle it lol

>>713314821 (OP)
everyone still uses GtG as their one-and-only monitor response time measurement despite being essentially useless. how do you expect this to be any different?

>inb4 nvidia cultists show up to defend DLSS as being better than just running a native resolution

Ok get a CRT to remove fake frames, you dont use LCD do you?

Well, you have to stop devs from being lazy and you already lost that war when you accepted day one patches. A fix it later attitude isn't going to change it to a get it right the first time mentality.

>>713314985
You have never owned a CRT you retarded poser.

>>713314821 (OP)
Okay, they'll do that, and the minimum requirements will now say 9070 XT / 5070 Ti, recommended 5090.

>>713314821 (OP)
I think for the ability to push down minimum requirements it's fine.
For recommended or other settings it should not even be a factor.

>>713315078
That's exactly what we want. Then we shift the focus on flaming devs for not even being good code monkeys.

I think frame generation and upscaling is fine as a user tool to get games running on their potatoes, but they should not be a tool for devs.

>>713315731
>fine as a user tool to get games running on their potatoes
This or people with high end rigs who just want really high frame rates.
Making it mandatory is cancer.