V fanboy: "V has a bigger map"

Reality: when the map feels less alive and is 95% barren, doesn't really mean much

V fanboy: "V sold more copies than IV so it's better"

Reality: using that logic would mean you think Minecraft is the greatest game of all time

V fanboy: "V is more fun to play so it's better"

Reality: Subjective emotions doesn't prove anything

V fanboy: "IV fanboys only think IV is better because of nostalgia"

Reality: since V has been nostalgic for years at this point, it must be the only reason people like V too right?

V fanboy: "people hated IV when it came out"

Reality: not even remotely true, it was hated the same as pretty much every gta game, by the small minority that was overshadowed by the large majority who loved it.

V fanboy: "V's story is better than IV's"

Reality: majority of V fans never played IV and majority (even admitting it) didn't even play V's story.

V fanboy: "physics aren't even realistic in IV, its much better in V"

Reality: on rare occasions the physics can be exaggerated sure, but for the most part its accurate and the physics still haven't been beaten by any R* game

V fanboy: "the missions in IV are all the same, it's go here, do a thing, come back"

Reality: basically the mission structure of all GTA games

V fanboy: "you can't fly planes in IV so V is better"

Reality: be honest with yourself and admit outside of online and missions, you don't even fly planes, you flew them once or twice and forgot about it.

>>713336752 (OP)
>zoomer boasts about how one 7th gen dogshit game is better than another 7th gen dogshit game
Consider suicide

Gigachad: Kills both of them and goes back to playing kinography of based tony

>>713336752 (OP)
none of this argument happened except in your head, schizo.

meds, now.

>>713336752 (OP)
V fanboys... how do we respond without sounding mad?

>>713336752 (OP)
>Reality: not even remotely true, it was hated the same as pretty much every gta game, by the small minority that was overshadowed by the large majority who loved it.
I was with you until you dropped this retarded revisionist zoomer shit. Get the fuck out of here, you underaged faggot.

That can't deny that IV is rough as hell around the edges.

>>713336752 (OP)
Vfags dont fret. It's not that it's a bad game. IV is just better.

>>713336851
Counts as IV

I played IV for the first time and gave up after 30 minutes, its pure jank

SA mogs both of them

>>713337163
>no car customizations
>money is practically useless
granted the Vigilante in IV is so much fun than the previous entries

>>713337250
true, gta 4 is like the second best gta.

>>713337515
no, that would be gta vc

>>713336752 (OP)
The best map is San Andreas
The best driving is V
The best story is IV
The best MC is a tie between Niko and CJ
The best side content is San Andreas
V lost a lot of humor, and all the NPC physics, it was amazing to push a fat zionist jew down a flight of metro stairs and see the realistic tumbling down

>>713337587
i don't know about that. san andreas is the original trilogy game worth playing in my opinion. gta 3 and vice city are just kind of the same, other than the music of course.

is the V fanboy in the room with us?