Dinosaurs are cool. Especially the T-Rex. Modern games about dinosaurs?
Hard mode: no MH

>>713348816 (OP)
Path of Titans
Prehistoric Kingdom

Only evidence of older Earth dates is radiometric dating, which is demonstrably wrong, rocks of known age give wrong dates.

>>713349254
What do you even believe
Young earth creationism?
What is your goal in trying to get people to doubt dinosaurs

>>713348816 (OP)
Final Fantasy VIII

Oh wait that’s a 1999 game, whatever

The Isle (slop)
Beasts of Bermuda (slop)
Prehistoric Kingdom (eh it's okay)
Primal Carnage Extinction (fun but slop)
ARK (actually kill yourself if you play this)
The recent Jurassic World games (slop)
Exoprimal (lol)

I would recommend King Kong 2005, Turok 1, Jurassic Park Operation Genesis, Age of Jura, Paraworld, and Dino Crisis

Turok

>>713349402
Dinosaurs are dragons. Dragons have been around forever in the human zeitgeist, dinosaurs are a Dareinisn Rockerfeller subversion of dragons, why is why each iteration of dinosaurs are lamer and gayer each year.

>>713349402
>get people to doubt dinosaurs
They existed of course, and still do (go look at a crocodile or cassowary or horseshoe crab, unchanged), it's just the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.

There is no recorded history before third-millennium BC.

Everything before recorded history is radiometric dating, which is pseudoscience, rocks of known age give incorrect dates by 100,000+ years.

That's the ONLY evidence of old Earth

Evidence of young Earth:

1. Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor
2. Bent Rock Layers
3. Soft Tissue in Fossils
4. Faint Sun Paradox
5. Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field
6. Helium in Radioactive Rocks
7. Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds
8. Short-Lived Comets
9. Very Little Salt in the Sea
10. DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/10-best-evidences-young-earth/

Soft tissue is found in dinosaur fossils, this couldn't be preserved ~60 million years.

Carbon-14 is found in diamonds supposedly billions of years old, but carbon-14 couldn't last longer than a few hundred thousand years at most.

If seawater originally contained no sodium, and the sodium accumulated at today’s rates, then today’s ocean saltiness would be reached in only 42 million years, only about 1/70 the three billion years evolutionists propose. After 3 billion years, we would expect to see 70x more salt in the ocean than we see today.

Going by the current models of the sun's nuclear fusion, the Earth would have been below freezing 3.5 billion years ago, when life supposedly evolved. (faint sun paradox)

The earth’s magnetic field is wearing down so quickly that it could be no more than 20,000 years old.

In many mountainous areas, rock layers thousands of feet thick have been bent and folded without fracturing. This couldn't happen if they were laid down separately over hundreds of millions of years and already hardened, they'd fracture.

You think anatomically modern humans did nothing for 200,000 years

>>713349774
>rocks of known age give incorrect dates by 100,000+ years.
So what if the results are that the rocks are 40 million years old?

>>713349774
Why are protestancucks like this?

>>713349859
An overdose of Israeli boots.

>>713349818
Rocks of known age obviously mean rocks created relatively recently, like rocks from recent volcanic eruptions, such as the 1980 Mt.St Helens eruptions which yes are supposed to date to 1980 (this is how it works, when the rock first solidifies and the father atoms decay into daughter atoms), but when tested with Potassium-Argon dating , give dates of 100,000+ years

>>713349989
>but when tested with Potassium-Argon dating , give dates of 100,000+ years
So what if the results are that some rocks are 40 million years old? Since the margin of error is only 100k years?

>>713349402
>get people to doubt dinosaurs
They existed of course, and still do (go look at a crocodile or cassowary or horseshoe crab, unchanged), it's just the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.

There is no recorded history before third-millennium BC.

Everything before recorded history is radiometric dating, which is pseudoscience, rocks of known age give incorrect dates by 100,000+ years.

That's the ONLY evidence of old Earth

Evidence of young Earth:

1. Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor
2. Bent Rock Layers
3. Soft Tissue in Fossils
4. Faint Sun Paradox
5. Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field
6. Helium in Radioactive Rocks
7. Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds
8. Short-Lived Comets
9. Very Little Salt in the Sea
10. DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/10-best-evidences-young-earth/

Soft tissue is found in dinosaur fossils, this couldn't be preserved ~60 million years.

Carbon-14 is found in diamonds supposedly billions of years old, but carbon-14 couldn't last longer than a few hundred thousand years at most.

If seawater originally contained no sodium, and the sodium accumulated at today’s rates, then today’s ocean saltiness would be reached in only 42 million years, only about 1/70 the three billion years evolutionists propose. After 3 billion years, we would expect to see 70x more salt in the ocean than we see today.

Going by the current models of the sun's nuclear fusion, the Earth would have been below freezing 3.5 billion years ago, when life supposedly evolved. (faint sun paradox)

The earth’s magnetic field is wearing down so quickly that it could be no more than 20,000 years old.

In many mountainous areas, rock layers thousands of feet thick have been bent and folded without fracturing. This couldn't happen if they were laid down separately over hundreds of millions of years and already hardened, they'd fracture.

You think anatomically modern humans did nothing for 200,000 years

>>713349402
Pastor diddling my butt said no.

Pic related, a cassowary

>>713350024
If something 20 years ago says it's 100,000 years old, it's likely something 40 years old would say it's 200,000 years old, and so on. Never said the margin of error was restricted to 100,000 years.

>>713350218
>it's likely
Got it, you have no idea. Thanks for conceding that the universe is about 13 billion years old
The "waaahhh radiometric dating is wrong" thing is made-up by the way

>>713349774
>>713350120
Bots?

>>713348816 (OP)
All dinosaur games released in the last 10 years fall in these categories:
>generic survivalcraft slop
>generic low budget FPS
>park manager
>indie horror

Outlook: grim.

>>713349774
>>713349254
So be honest with me here. Are you a troll, angry at these threads for some perceived slight? Or do you actually believe this shit and want to flood any thread about dinosaurs with it to stamp out differing opinions.

>>713350313
He's a newnigger who has been brainwashed by the modern /pol/ LARP where they pretend to be hardcore Christians. Many such cases

>>713350302
I didn't mean to post that second one, ignore it.

I'm not a bot though.

>>713350313
I'm upset that people believe pseudo-scientific old Earth dates and ignore the ample amount of evidence to the contrary.

>>713350394
Ahh, so it’s the second one and you’re just crazy. That checks out.
>>713350390
What a pity.

>>713350284
>13 billion years old

It used to be 13.4, then 13.6, then 13.8, now there's some studies saying it's 26.7 billion

How are they coming up with these bullshit numbers in the first place? They make guesses based on "cosmic microwave background", basically some fucking shitty thermometer they shot into space reading temperatures.

>>713348816 (OP)
>Especially the T-Rex.
WRONG

>>713350682
>DEF build
>cool

>>713349774
>Earth is less than 10,000 years old
How are you going to explain evolution then? Because 10,000 years is not enough for that.

>>713350714
By saying "obviously everyone knows micro evolution is real but MACRO evolution cannot happen"
It's like you never laughed at a creationist before

If these rock layers were million of years old, a tree couldn't be inside them

The only way that happens is if they're not millions of years old but these layers were rapidly deposited around the tree by something like a global flood

Countless examples of other living animals/plants fossilized inside different rock layers supposed to be millions of years apart

>>713350714
>Origin of life
There's no known way to turn non-living material into life, it's never been done before even in a lab. The belief that dust/water just randomly formed into functional DNA, proteins, a cell, etc. capable of reproducing itself is absurd.

>DNA
We OBSERVE genetic mutations delete data over time (e.g. we started with a grey wolf and only got increasingly retarded dogs like pugs and chihuahuas). You're just deleting or changing data randomly, and SELECTING from what is already there, and over time it always results in a net loss.

This alone proves Darwinism couldn't happen. Natural selection is real but it has limits, Darwinists are so retarded they look at a process and think it must have no limit.

https://youtu.be/jyATE9StbK8

>Origin of sexual reproduction
There is no known way asexual creatures could develop sexual reproduction through mutation. Any benefits (or the obvious -50% efficiency) are irrelevant. It's not possible.

This is called irreducible complexity, one part is useless or harmful without the other part(s).

>Missing links
There is not a SINGLE transitionary fossil series. There is some speculated, but none show transitions.

The scientific community believed Piltdown Man was a human ancestor for decades before discovering it was a hoax. The entire "fossil record" is unscientific, lining up the remains of different animals is not evidence they evolved into each other.

>>713350595
any sort of criticism of science is going to come across as non genuine or retarded if you think a book written by barely literate desert dwellers from over a thousand years ago is a better way to understand reality.

>>713350709
yeah?

>>713350768
Darwinists seriously think random DNA copying mistakes resulted in different mechanisms that are all useless or harmful by themselves until they're fully completed.

This is a really good example, it has two chemicals that when touch explode at 100C.

Every part of this is useless or harmful and would remain so for countless millions of generations, never having any reason to be selected for at best, until all of the different parts were completed... randomly.

This is essentially like me flipping random bits in your OS and expecting to get new features.

Darwinists are so stupid they see natural selection and think it must be limitless, they must also think if they keep jumping they'll launch into space.

>>713350801
>"All dating methods are wrong and jewish lies"
>"Look at these layers, dating methods say they are millions of years old so a tree couldn't be inside them"

Which one is it? Are the methoids jewish lies and can't be trusted or are they accurate and the trees are going through millions of years?

no good dino games, no good pirate games

>>713350801
So where does life come from and how did animals become the way they are today?
Do you have a better explanation?

>>713351595
Design from a creator, who exists outside of time, space, and matter.

He programmed DNA for each animal kind, and allowed it to have limited adaptability and variation autonomously.

You eat calcium and iron, and turn into a human, because your DNA programming says so. A cat eats calcium and iron, and turns it into a cat.

Oakwood

Dinosaurs are fucking cool.

the consolidation and subsequent de-moderation of the internet has led to complete and utter drooling, insipid morons being given platforms and audiences that they do not deserve and should not have. The threads of anti-intellectualism have taken root and will exist so long as social media exists and encourages these behaviors.

I like the gigantosaurus

>>713352446
i like carnotaurus and parasaurolophus

>>713352446
>I like the gigantosaurus
Based, me too

>>713352493
>i like carnotaurus
Based, me too

>>713352446
1) The internet was less moderated in the past
2) There's only one anti-intellectual here, and it's your side using typical censorship, dogma, defunding, and ad-hominem arguments like you're using right now when confronted with how flimsy your paradigms are

>>713352446
>Hurrdurr da urff is billions and billions of years old, I know this because a really smart guy in a labcoat told me

Atheists LITERALLY believe humans would have died if they didn't develop some eyebrows to keep water out of their eyes

>>713351847
>a creator, who exists outside of time, space, and matter
I don't know, anon, I'm not very smart but that sounds more wacky than million years of evolution.
And who crated this "creator" anyway?

>>713352623
you would've been banned from any BBS or random forum for being a mouthbreathing dipshit. God I miss when the internet was much, much smaller. At least I could talk about dinosaurs

Which game has the most species?

>>713352446
>>713352493
>>713352528
>>713352601
I like Allosaurus.

>>713352735
>And who crated this "creator" anyway?
Your brain can't comprehend existence outside time/space/matter so it's not worth thinking about.

>I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.

>>713352857
>when confronted by something he can't explain, he goes "well it's unexplainable"

>Newfags don't know the Mormons have a dedicated presence on 4chan to save our souls

lol, lmao.

>>713352735
Noone created the creator, he is the eternal exception, which is a necessary precondition for everything. How do you think the universe came to be?

>>713352804
I think the new jurassic world games have a lot if you include the DLCs but that includes their Movie-only dinos.

I think there's some type of operation genesis clone being made but idk how big it is

>>713352889
>When confronted by something that can't be explained he goes "I CAN TOTALLY EXPLAIN THAT"

>>713353000
Why do you expect anybody to be swayed by any of your arguments, if their core is "I can't explain this but you have to believe me"?

bonk