>>713349238 (OP)have to go with galaxy 1, galaxy 2 is a good game and all but it's not as unique as the first is
Sunshine
Lol just kidding, Galaxy 2
>>713349238 (OP)On a technical level, probably Galaxy 2. But you only get to have that magical moment of something completely novel and breathtaking once.
1 is better, the space aesthetics feel the strongest in it.
2 is basically just a glorified DLC with more levels by comparison.
>>713349238 (OP)Galaxy 1
Galaxy 2 is partially a retread, and everything to do with Yoshi aside from the pepper dash sucks.
>>713349238 (OP)Rosalina's immediate emergent popularity in Galaxy 1 and Mario Kart Wii buckbroke Shigeru Miyamoto so hard he removed Rosalina from 95% of Galaxy 2.
>>713349238 (OP)1 has better atmosphere
2 ditches the atmosphere to be a better videogame
>>713349238 (OP)2 by far has the better music AND gameplay
Hard to say, 2 has a great finale with the grand master galaxy however most of the green stars are stupid and bloat the game. Meanwhile 1 doesn't have as great of a send off.
1 also has better music, hub world, and powerups. Yeah I'm going with 2.
2 is the better game. 1 has better atmosphere.
Wait, what is this?
>U R MR GAY
What did Nintendo mean by this?
>>713349238 (OP)I hate using this word but Mario galaxy 1 is a legit epic feeling game
1 feels more epic and atmospheric, 2 is mario world in space
>>713358583>UR MILYNintendo's troon propaganda
>>713349238 (OP)Galaxy was like a demo compared to Galaxy2.
Why was Galaxy 2 excluded from the 3D Collection?
Which one is the easiest to mod? Probably that one
>>713349238 (OP)Galaxy 1 is a snoozefest carried hard by its presentation. Galaxy 2 is the greatest 3D platformer of all time.
>>713349238 (OP)Galaxy 2 fucking sucks, one of the level of galaxy 2 is literally called "throwback galaxy" and the level it's just whompback fortress from Mario 64, the spring power up sucks, the rock power up sucks, galaxy 1 is such a better game that it's not even funny
>>713349238 (OP)never met some who chose galaxy 2 that was a mentally well adjusted individual
>>713361727your birth was like a demo compared to my cock ravaging your mom
>>713362054Galaxy 1 also had the spring
2 is the better actual game with a much stronger difficulty curve. 1 has the better aesthetics by a country mile though.
We need Galaxy 3 to balance these two out
Galaxy 1 is more memorable because you have to go through most stars thrice.
2 is way better, 1 is my less liked 3d Mario.
>>713361753cuz it's getting a full scale remake for mario's 40th.
>sourcecame to me in a dream
>>713362358You can't expect people who are wrong to know what they're talking about.
1. 2 had a non-existent narrative, seemingly consisted of nothing but linear gimmick and minigame levels and doesn't even have the illusion of allowing you to explore off the beaten track.
>>713363015Odyssey is a sequel to 64 and Sunshine's sandbox style 3D Mario, Galaxy and 3D Land/World are more linear course clear 3D Mario games. This comes straight from Nintendo.
>>713365319>2 had a non-existent narrativeglad to see other people caring about this
>>713365319>2 had a non-existent narrativeOpinion immediately discarded
>>713365319i just dont like how many galaxies in 2 only have a single star and a prankster comet that barely changes anything
I hate how restrictive the progression in Galaxy 2 is. Nintendo forgot the whole point of the star system, to allow you to pick what you wanted to do and skip the ones you didn't like, but Galaxy 2 put way to strict limits on what you needed to do to progress so you were forced to do almost every star no matter how much you hated it.
I look at Mario Galaxy 2 in the same way that I look at Lost Levels. It really doesn't add much new, it was just a collection of unused/unfinished ideas from the first game and it shows. It just feels like you're playing Mario Galaxy 1 again but there's a level with Yoshi in it.