>game starts
>10 second intro
>peaceful playground to test your moves
>jump into first level whenever you're ready, no stinky tutorial
Why didn't more games learn from this?
>>713551613 (OP)It also hijacks player control not even 20 seconds into giving you the ability to move. That's an instant drop from me.
>>713551613 (OP)The tutorial used to come with the booklet.
Most games before 1996 didn't have a tutorial, period. I guess SNES StarFox is the biggest example otherwise.
>>713551613 (OP)Sovl. It had lots of graphical glitches. And then OoT came and I was baffled that here were no graphical glitches at all no matter how hard you try to create them.
People were smarter and more curious back then, they would naturally pick up the new three-pronged controller and want to try out all the controls so a courtyard with varying terrain height was all you needed. Kids today have no curiosity.
>>713551613 (OP)>learn fromThat felt like the norm until a few years after this. Even Galaxy, the second best Mario game, had a tutorial
>game asks you if you want tutorials
>say no
>game keeps ripping control away from me to give me tutorials anyway
>>713551613 (OP)>Why didn't more games learn from this?It's because devs and publishers think the average gamer is a retard. It shows their contempt for you.
>>713552550holy shit this is so much clearer than any modern ingame tutorial
why did they stop doing manuals (I can understand physical ones but there's no reason to have a digital version of this shit for every game)
>>713553836>no reason to haveI meant no reason to NOT have, I'm tired boss
>>713552550This lol you literally wouldn't know how to do 90% of moves since the game never tells you. Nothing intuitive about the flip jump or whatever
>>713551613 (OP)>Why didn't more games learn from this?Because normies got into the hobby and they're retarded, so everything has to be dumbed down for them
>>713554557I disagree
video games are for children and children have always been retarded
