Gunner, Sabot, Tank!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUFWzgJ-W28

>that flying T-72 hull
lol lmao

>>713587979
VGH.... the germvnic military... conqvering the bolshevik horde.....

Just a few days ago I played that mission where you are just like two Abrams at night trying to make your way back or something.
First attempt failed because after getting out of the first village I got btfo and never even knew where from because my nightvision and rangefinder were cooked (literally) for some reason.

Next attempt it took until the second village, but suddenly a bunch of russian armor came running down a hill while my dudes I was supposed to rescue or something bailed in reverse.
Gladly the first ivan exploded into such a bonfire that even without night vision I could see everyone.
When nobody came anymore I wondered why the mission didn't end.
Turns out the one guy I had already mission killed neede to be completely knocked out. After he went up in flames that was it.

Especially that last onslaught was pretty tense.

>>713588029
The Leo 1 is handsome.

>>713588029
The Leo 1 is handsome.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0on3I62tCg

I like missions where you are outgunned and outnumbered so you have to use stealth and hit and run tactics to win.

>>713588029
Based and panzerpilled. The spirit of Heinz lives on in every perfectly arced sabot round. Nothing hits harder than that first clunk *whump* of a 120mm sending a BMP to Gopnik Valhalla. Modern tank sims with proper FCS and thermals just make it feel so surgical. The Ivan spam may be endless, but so are my HEAT rounds.

So it's Arma but you don't get infantry, cars, APCs, helos or jets?

>>713589928
No

>>713590567
So how is it different? Nothing I've seen in videos looks more advanced or detailed.

>>713590825
>So how is it different?
Uhm, like, by being an entirely different game?
What fuckass retard question is that?

>>713591220
What makes it better than Arma's tank combat?

>>713589928
ackshually you do have all those they're just not playable (APCs are playable if like being cannon fodder)

>>713591410
No idea, I haven't played Arma in like a decade.
However, this game is based on tank combat, so the controls are about the best I have ever had in a game with tanks.

>>713586053 (OP)
Did they change the name?
Also did they put the wiesel in it already?

>>713591867
>Did they change the name?
No, it's still Gunner, HEAT, PC!

>did they put the wiesel in it already?
No, that's a Leopard 1A1A1

>>713591867
>Did they change the name?
No, but calling gunner sabot tank is a very common one; they only chose GHPC because it sounded cooler.
>Also did they put the wiesel in it already?
No, and apparently they won't because it's HURF DURF RIGHT AFTER THE CUTOFF POINT DURRRRRRRRRRRRRR or something like that

>>713592010
>AFTER THE CUTOFF POINT
they never learn

>>713592260
Soul
<<<Soulless

>>713592421
Even dude in the turret looks demoralized as fuck

>>713592461
kek

>>713587979
wut
there's nothing that's flying in that pic

I'm looking forward to this one because it seems like a less autistic steel beasts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXqmQkVTIVE

>Simulation
>Realistic
>Can fight helicopters in a tank
>3 years in early access
>devs close threads where people describe in game bugs

So why would I play this over warthunder?

>>713592604
horrrry shit is this finally M1 Tank Platoon 2: the long awaited sequel?

>>713592654
you dont get spawncamped by CAS in this one

>NAFO wunderwaffe
vgh... who needs autoloaders when you have zoggolems

>>713593034
>seething zigger tranny
ready rack is faster than any shit autoloader

>>713592604
looks meh, tanks look like they're floating over the terrain, no recoil shock, no sway, suspension looks like it's not there at all

>>713592654
Why would you play War Thunder over anything

>>713593247
sunk cost

>>713593247
if you disregard the grind and p2w, it's actually a very decent game

>>713593681
>if you disregard the grind and p2w, it's actually a very decent game
Which makes it even worse. It is a good game at its core, but all the shit piled on top of it just completely covers up anything good.

>>713592519
watch the video in the OP, it's at 0:59

>>713587979
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_0U5thy31o

>>713593931
i agree anon, and i dislike it too. shame, caue i really like the combat

>>713594407
warthunder and the rice cooker are looking pretty good right there lmao

>>713593681
true. unfortunately, anton is a total krok-fueled cockgobbler who vill never add new game modes.
t. 5000 hours before quitting

>>713594203
Oh for some reason I completely brainfarted and didnt see the vid

>>713592654
>>713593681
War Thunder is not a tank game, it's an arena shooter with a different control scheme and a tank skin on it.

>>713596305
I like how WT is just "tanks" for people nowadays, when it started out as planes only.

>>713592624
>>Can fight helicopters in a tank
M830A1

>>713596894
Well in this case since we're talking GHPC the tank portion is the important one. Planes are, or at least used to be in the earlier days, much better. Sim mode wasn't completely ignored and was decent, at least compared to the mess that tanks are. No idea how it is now, haven't played WT in years.

Tank sim is just awful, zero care or thought put into it but that makes sense as most of the braindead playerbase can barely handle "realistic" mode as it is.

>>713597112
fair enough

>>713597112
I loved WT early sim tank battles since it eliminated the peeking around a corner fuckery that all third person shooters have

>>713600792
Sadly the initial release is pretty much all the attention and devtime it ever got as far as I know. The playerbase is too fucking stupid for sim modes anyway so the devs will never put a meaningful amount of effort into it.

Just look at ships, they had to butcher them to make battles faster to appease the retards, and even then they think they're "boring" because they're too slow.

>>713601298
And I don't understand it.
Arcade tanks is a horrible mess more akin to a twitch shooter than a tank sim.
I always enjoyed Realistic battles because it actually warranted SOME tanker skill compared to Arcade and wasn't as busted as Sim mode.
But that was right after tanks were introduced; I think I played until the first Tiger and then stopped.
Glad I never paid a cent for anything.

Is it real GHPC/tonk thread or /pol/shit?
Man I wished they used SABoW/Kharkov control scheme. It's very immersive and not really scary/complex as DCS/BMS sims. Hell tanks aren't so complex even in Steel Beasts.

>>713592654
War Thunder is an AI slop game.

>>713602006
>Is it GHPC/tonk thread
Yes.

>dead genre dead thread
It's so over.

>>713604107
FPV drone game when?

>>713602006
What level of derangement do you have to be at to think there's anything /pol/ about this thread?

>>713605047
When you can extrapolate thread quality and its content from 200x300 catalog picture with 95% success rate while multiboxing EVE online.

Man I just want all the mechanics and tanks from war thunder in a single player game.

>>713605420
Apparently you can't