https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
never forget:
regardless of how many times shills say otherwise, it is not about keeping games online forever.
it's about protecting our digital ownership rights as consumers.
>>713632473 (OP)Don't care, post more Jucika.
ohnonono perixisters what is this...
>>713632473 (OP)This is just gamer gate again.
People intentionally misunderstanding what the movement is about because the gaming industry pays them off.
At least this time we have an actual clear plan of action and can petition the EU since they actually care about consumer rights.
Ah, the trannypeteia subhuman strikes again.
>>713632473 (OP)The only thing I get from this image is a reminder that I could have fucked a cute polish girl coworker and I didnt go for it.
>STOP KILLING GAMES!How about stop buying shit games
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOPqzsl7Ey0
> I love number 3
HL3 confirmed.
>>713633315This guy comes off as completely schizophrenic.
>>713633615He's the Rat Man, dude. Of course he's schizo.
>>713632473 (OP)How come this needed a million signatures, but unpopular legislation can go through with 0?
>>713633860Is there the equivalent of opensecrets.org for the EU?
>>713632473 (OP)I signed, but really, the best you can do is buy on gog or just pirate and avoid online only games.
>>713632473 (OP)This typically isn't a problem if you have more discerning taste in games you buy
I haven't bought a Ubisoft, Activision, or EA game in over 13 years and have never encountered this "games as a service" ownership issue
>>713632795I played what I think was the very first demo of it and thought it was meh. I'm interested in trying it out again when it comes out of Early Access but until then thanks for beta testing, losers.
>>713632473 (OP)I signed like 24 hours after the initiative went Online. Good times
>>713634091cool story bro, but i like owning what i buy, even the shitty games i bought are still mine and i will not allow you or mr shekelstein to take anything away from me, ever
yoda
md5: ecb46c7b05d07170f1f97bab231f4bb0
🔍
>>713632473 (OP)A womb… Marie will never have — much like the Peri fanbase.
>>713632473 (OP)yeah but you only care about it on (literal) paper
they still swindle you they just have to write when they plan to do it on a paper that you won't read
Reminder: something like Mega Man X Dive Offline can exist
>the shitpost thread with the bait op is getting more (you)s
>>713636607Bait exists for a reason.
>>713636607It's fine, the more attention the better. Discussing the evil eceleb bumps the threads
I am of the belief that if a game dies, it was for a reason. Governments should not have any more control over anyone in the gaming space, because if game companies are forced to maintain servers for games with only two or three people left playing, then they're going to offset costs on the players. This is just basic economics. Also, have you ever considered what these "organizers" stand to benefit from this endeavor? Moral altruism sure doesn't put food on the table, and most of these greasy neckbeards need a steady supply of tendies to grandstand.
Besides, private community servers provide better experiences than anything a soulless company can ever do. If you're too lazy to connect to one, then that's on you.
