These are good graphics according to boomers
>>713656267 (OP)They're good graphics, anon.
>>713656267 (OP)Art style > number of flops being pushed. Stylized graphics > realism.
I can tell OP is going to spam this for the next week.
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/search/image/t0ffEefOgACL5CZ4h9uDZw/
>>713656938The art style of OP is atrocious and garish
>>713656267 (OP)Are they not good graphics? What are "good graphics" considering the era in which it was made? What do you even compare it to at the time?
>>713656267 (OP)Everything is incredibly readable.
file
md5: e73d71662567921eff39e44aa2fe8780
🔍
You already posted this thread you niggerfaggotkike.
>>713656267 (OP)It's insane that this is the peak of graphical fidelity almost 30 years later I wish all jews burn in hell for eternity
>>713661529it runs like butter which is more than can be said for a lot of other NES games
Why did you stop posting the terraria skeleton dude?
>>713656267 (OP)Still looks great, yeah. Cleaner and more appealing than most indie platformers.