Can everyone on /v/ give a big collective thank you to Nintendo fans who agreed to beta test for the rest of us? I'll be buying the improved Switch 2 that doesn't have a shit screen in a couple of years.

Thank you.

>>713656759 (OP)
I'll be installing the emulator that comes out within the next few months
Thank you paypiggies, for getting nintendo to make your favorite games, so i can pirate them

>>713657002
Two more week eric

>>713656759 (OP)
As long as you buy it I'm good and you're welcome. The more nintendo consoles sell, the happier I am.

I play on TV only so it's not an issue for me.

>>713656759 (OP)
The current screen will be flawless until the next one comes out that fixes all the current one’s problems at which point tendies will finally acknowledge it was shit. It’s the tendie cycle.

>>713657081
>The more nintendo consoles sell, the happier I am
not a cult by the way

>>713657081
I'll be buying it used and will hack it, but thanks for paying for my free games lmao

>>713656759 (OP)
Yes, thank you switch 2 buyers for funding development and manufacturing of the oled switch 2. I’ll be enjoying my oled switch until then.

>>713657081
>The more nintendo consoles sell, the happier I am.

>>713657626
>said the snoys every sony earnings jerking off at ps5 numbers

>>713657838
kek

>>713657676
good luck with that.

>>713656759 (OP)
>thanking useful idiots for being useful idiots

>>713656759 (OP)
>Pirat_Nation

>had a nightmare that I owned a switch 2
>woke up in a cold sweat, opened my laptop
>still 480hz
Pfew

>>713658292
Thanks for the bump, tendie.

>>713656759 (OP)
>I'll be buying the improved Switch 2
Based. Me too

>>713656759 (OP)
I'm appreciative for Nintendo explaining the concept of pixel response times to normies. People would always go on about muh refresh rate as if that's the only thing that mattered.

>>713656759 (OP)
I already own one, but I'll happily buy a second one if it's an improved version, that way I can hack the one I have and still have the better version to play online, it's win/win for everyone.

>PC Gamer

LOL

>>713658634
Shills really think people on /v/ are like this

>>713658748
You could sell them a bladed nintendo bowser dildo and they'd still buy the lower quality version that comes out 2 years later as long as it fixes the shape of the blade

India belongs to Pakistan

>>713658456
Ooof, stellar blade sold 3 million copies, that means it outsold mario kart

>>713656759 (OP)
what the fuck does "slower" mean in this context?

>>713656759 (OP)
HOW MANY GODDAMN TIMES ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE THIS THREAD?

>>713657585
The point isn't that it's flawless, it's that it's perfectly fine. It could be better, sure, but that's literally always true unless you buy the newest PC hardware the moment it becomes available.

>>713659236
it's worse than the switch 1 launch screen hahahhaa

>>713656759 (OP)
They’re never gonna release a version with a screen on par with a gaming monitor

>>713656759 (OP)
don't know why anyone still listens to digital foundry, it's obvious they would have caught this but got paid not to say shit

>>713659079
Pixel response. If you need to ask this you're too retarded to understand this discussion so just close the tab

>>713659079
it's cope word by sony fanboys

>>713659236
>it's that it's perfectly fine
17ms is DS tier, it is not perfectly fine you shit eating tendie

>>713656759 (OP)
I'm honestly impressed Nintendo managed to find an LCD with a 17ms response time still being manufactured in 2025. That's like 2008 era chinkshit offbrand level of bad. I would have thought even the most dumpster tier shit made today would exceed that purely through technical progress lifting the quality floor

>>713656759 (OP)
>according to "independent" testing

>>713659652
They can still patch the console the overclock the screen. The reason they haven't is because it has dogshit battery life as is and overclocking would make it even worse.

>>713658367
>unironically buying a craptop
You're no better.

>>713660130
I need the portability I have friends and a job unlike you NEET

>>713660063

>>713659553
And wasn't the original switch 22ms? no one complained about it.