>>713715014 (OP)I'm glad you like it OP but I don't like Bethesda undercooking more and more of their games. Fallout 4 had everything half-cooked, Starfield's dough is raw in most places. Even if you like the taste of uncooked dough, like the game got all this time in development and it still feels like they could have done more / should have been given more time. Like Redguard and Morrowind are older games that were innovative, around Oblivion was when elements were becoming "undercooked". Oblivion was where it started, moving onto Fallout 3 where it became obvious in terms of combat, story, worldbuilding, etc. There's a lot of good in it but there's like big issues that feel like they just didn't care or were rushed. My favorite Fallout game, NV, is still undercooked too, I know they didn't make it but they were still involved with it in several different ways, it feels undercooked, in particular the Legion. Not as bad as other Fallout games but still. Skyrim has a lot of nonsensical and undercooked elements. Garbage combat, a weak story, little consequences for your actions, being able to join contradictory factions and a lack of deivations from the heavily railroaded quest design, most holds being lame as fuck, etc. Fallout 4 has every single aspect of it half-cooked, every cool thing about it sucks in some sort of way and it feels like parts of the game are actually missing, like Nick Valentine content, the main story, the institute, the ocean, The extremely limited settlement system, the robotics DLC, Nuka world and the janky and almost unplayable raider system, Fallout 76 was that on a whole other level that game released raw and it was inexcusable, and even when fixed it feels like a cashgrab game and Fallout losing it's identity. Starfield has so many undercooked elements I opened up Fallout 4 to apologize to it. I can get some enjoyment out of Starfield, but the game is a direct downgrade from Fallout 4 and they doubled down on all of Fallout 4's issues.