How cheap do OLEDs have to get before poorfags stop bitching?
You can now buy a 42" 4k 144hz TV for like $700. I've seen the 27" 1440p 240hz QD-OLED monitors go for like $450, and they've probably been cheaper than that. It wasn't too long ago that 240hz IPS panels were that expensive. It's going to be funny when even the most miserly poorfags can finally afford them then everyone pretends like they always knew it's incredible tech and they would never use anything else

>but... muh burn in muhfuggah

>>713747664 (OP)
>ou can now buy a 42" 4k 144hz TV for like $700
42 inch 4k 144hz OLED for 700 bucks? Fucking where?

>>713747664 (OP)
don't give a fuck how cheap they get
they're interior tech

I still have not seen a single reason to own anything other than a 1080p 60hz monitor.

i have a zenbook oled and I still prefer my profesionally calibrated lg sm90. it just looks better.

>>713747664 (OP)
Cheap enough to not be more expensive than every other monitor I'm using. 16+ hours every day, half of it is productivity mostly on the same screen.
I have to vomit when I see that shitty youtube monitor channel video of "IM DELIBERATELY BURNING IN MY OLED"
Dude you are using it like a normal monitor. I have an Oled for a TV, I'm running it 4-5 hours a day on varied content, that is okay. But as a god damn monitor? You are either not using it or you can replace it in every six months.

I still use the same led tv from 8 years ago because I'm not a consumerist whore, and only bought it because my dog broke the previous one by throwing a fucking ball at it
Since Oled can't even last 3 years, I'd rather avoid it until they're like £300

>>713749923
proof?

>>713749923
they actually work quite well outdoors

>>713747664 (OP)
Been using OLED laptops since 2016, as long as you dont mind babying it and you watch/play a lot of shit then go for it. Dont buy it if you only play competitive games or dont watch/play a lot of shit.
OLEDs have gotten more resistant to burn-in but it will still happen eventually; nothing we cant do till micro-led reaches consumer market.

>>713747664 (OP)
Even if they figure out how to fix every single flaw with the technology (impossible) and become cheaper than LCD, I will absolutely never buy an OLED.

>>713750391
>I will absolutely never buy an OLED
We know, you're poor and have terrible genetics. Congenitally philistine.

>tfw im still using a plasma i bought 14 years ago

Not as good as OLED but still better than everything else.

>>713747664 (OP)
>42" 4k 144hz TV for like $700
post link

>>713747664 (OP)
>$450
youre going to need to take a few hundred off that before i buy one

300 dollars
im not paying any more than that for a monitor
i already get me oled fix on my psvr2 or my bigscreen beyond

>>713747664 (OP)
I'm too much involved in static content (browsing, reading, etc) to buy an OLED. Do I like it? Sure, but it just doesn't make sense for me to buy an OLED monitor.

If it isn’t at least 60” you’re a child

cheap enough to throw in the garbage and buy new every three years because of burn-in

>>713752531
Yep, here's severe OLED burn in after a mere 20 months.

>>713754037
Another example of horrific OLED burn in on a different panel, again after only 20 months.

>>713754198
Ready to give up yet, OLED fags? Yet another panel bites the dust. Not even two years lifespan!

>>713750047
>I still have not seen
lmao of course you haven't, with that monitor

Oh wait, these are all LCD screens!
>>713754037
LG QNED80 2022. Light guide cracking.
>>713754198
Vizio M6 Series Quantum 2021. Various layers deforming due to backlight heat.
>>713754320
Hisense U8H. Backlight beginning to fail.

Pic related is the reality. QD-OLED during the same time frame. 6000 hours of static content blasted at maximum brightness. ZERO BURN IN. I expect kneeling.

Also a reminder that IPS comes with low light deformities (backlight bleed) and glow burned in straight from the factory, kek. You can't even look at your 800:1 "blacks" without being reminded of how much of a poorfag you are.

>>713754037
>>713754198
>>713754320
obvious bait was obvious, that's not what oled burn-in looks like.

>>713755054
I'm amazed you managed to see it through all the glow

I have an oled TV and occasionally play on it, but I want my monitor to display text clearly and not having to bother with "pixel refreshes" or babying it with multiple cope burn in mitigations

>>713747664 (OP)
I'm currently shopping for a monitor/TV and I would go oled but burn in is a thing. I use my TV as a monitor often and things like task bars browsers bars etc are static and on screen for long periods of time. Not a good combo

>>713749376
LG previous gen models

>>713750358
>1000 nits
>Outdoors
Yeah if you're permanently in the shade or only out at night. 15,000 nits is the standard target for outdoor displays.

>>713747664 (OP)
They would need to become free because I want replacements for free when the static elements that are one areas of my monitor 16 hours a day, every single day burn in.

No I am not using your meme pixel refresh, I'm not turning the monitor off every few hours and I'm not using any other retarded bandaids for this shit technology.

>OLEDtrannies
>tech literarily kills itself
Like poetry

>>713747664 (OP)
don't care
still buying LCDs

>>713747664 (OP)
A 450 dollar monitor is not cheap anon