Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:25:29 PM No.713830881
What made it so great?
Replies:
Thread 713830881 - /v/ [Archived: 758 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:36:11 PM No.713831759
>>713830881 (OP)
like mount and blade it was really the only game of its genre so people put work into fixing its flaws and were more willing to put up with its jank
like mount and blade it was really the only game of its genre so people put work into fixing its flaws and were more willing to put up with its jank
Replies:
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:40:15 PM No.713832104
>>713831759
Do you think Kitten Space Agency will be a worthy successor?
Do you think Kitten Space Agency will be a worthy successor?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:42:10 PM No.713832272
>>713832104
Maybe if they drop the gay name
Maybe if they drop the gay name
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:44:40 PM No.713832484
why can't they just make a space game that is a true successor to orbiter?
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:50:00 PM No.713832951
>>713832104
Could be. With KSP1 standing on years of mods and polish (but still a lot of jank) and KSP2’s absolutely brutal failure, I think people will have a high bar for a KSP-successor. Realistically I think all they have to do is
>provide good building tools both for entry level casuals but allowing autists to turn up the complexity
>make sure the game is stable, every KSP has had issues with wobbling/timewarping/orbit data dying to floating point errors making things very frustrating
>have a decent number of different parts and allow parts to be scaled
>allow in-orbit/on-site construction for rovers/bases
>give players something long term to do on planetaey surfaces and reasons beyond science and contracts to press further into space
personally I hope they will have mind enough to drop the “junkyard space program” that KSP forces so hard because its an excuse to make everything intentionally look/perform bad.
Could be. With KSP1 standing on years of mods and polish (but still a lot of jank) and KSP2’s absolutely brutal failure, I think people will have a high bar for a KSP-successor. Realistically I think all they have to do is
>provide good building tools both for entry level casuals but allowing autists to turn up the complexity
>make sure the game is stable, every KSP has had issues with wobbling/timewarping/orbit data dying to floating point errors making things very frustrating
>have a decent number of different parts and allow parts to be scaled
>allow in-orbit/on-site construction for rovers/bases
>give players something long term to do on planetaey surfaces and reasons beyond science and contracts to press further into space
personally I hope they will have mind enough to drop the “junkyard space program” that KSP forces so hard because its an excuse to make everything intentionally look/perform bad.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 10:53:22 PM No.713833230
>>713831759
Mount & Blade is a good comparison, because Bannerlord is to Warband what Kerbal 2 is to Kerbal.
Mount & Blade is a good comparison, because Bannerlord is to Warband what Kerbal 2 is to Kerbal.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 11:06:28 PM No.713834343
>>713833230
im still mad about bannerlord but at least it got released
>warband suffers into mid game where you have to find a way to fight enemy doomstacks on your first castle or town
>suffers heavily into late game where too many meanial things demand the player’s direct attention requiring you to babysit things for years
>bannerlord releases and has the same exact macro-level design issues into mid and late game and more
>doomstacks are even worse
im still mad about bannerlord but at least it got released
>warband suffers into mid game where you have to find a way to fight enemy doomstacks on your first castle or town
>suffers heavily into late game where too many meanial things demand the player’s direct attention requiring you to babysit things for years
>bannerlord releases and has the same exact macro-level design issues into mid and late game and more
>doomstacks are even worse