>the future of gaming is rendering each and ever pore and hair on her nose

Who ever thought this? No one will notice.

>>713890307 (OP)
>No one will notice.
you made a thread about it tho. also the players will subconsciously notice and feel more immersed. This is literally science

>>713890307 (OP)
Ever realise that maybe 3D modellers are passionate about their work and goes the extra mile with detail

>>713890307 (OP)
> not even any nostril hair
literally not worth my time

do that but with boobs and ass

>>713890307 (OP)
>rendering
>anon doesn't know what normal maps are

god i want to fuck aloy's nose so bad bros

And yet no pubes [sad blue alien]

>>713890307 (OP)
>vidya is finally catchup with kpop

Why can't devs just focus on gameplay?

>>713891114
Because Hollywood fags got into gaming because they know Hollywood itself is dead

>>713891114
Too hard

>>713891114
3D artists don't do gameplay, they do graphics

>>713890307 (OP)
How many years until this level of detail is viable on VR?

>>713891114
What do you need gameplay for when you can have cutscenes and QTE?

>>713890307 (OP)
>the future of gaming is rendering each and ever pore and hair on her nose
No, ai slop will generate patten along with 5+ in between frames and 128p-4k upscaling

>>713890307 (OP)
Nobody is going to notice because as soon as the opening cutscenes ends and the players are given control the game's going to switch to using low poly models and never go back.

>>713890307 (OP)
>pulling the hairs with a twezzer lowers your health a bit but improves your looks

>>713890307 (OP)
>We cant create good gameplay, so how can we overcharge our shit products? I KNOW! Lets make SHADOWS extremely detailed! Oh wait, lets add skin PORES and skin HAIRS! Holy shit thats genius! Fuck the gamplay half of these idiots dont even play games anyways!

>>713891481
>a 5min segment in a 30h game
>ahh help me asmongold im being genocided!

i wish giant pores on my nose weren't rendering

>>713890723
>boobs
Do you really want thin black hairs on female areolas? You know they tweeze those, right?

>>713890958
sounds like you don't know what rendering is

>>713891114
Because it's 3D artists who do this shit, they don't deal with gameplay.

>>713892407
Yes, I want them. Veins, too.

>>713892407
y-yes...

This sort of stuff seems so pointless

>>713892407
when i got VR and watched VR porn i came so fucking hard because females that used to be idealized and smudgy in flat videos were now in life size right in front of me, every fault and blemish visible. you can tell how short they are and how their arms are a little too long for their torso. you can see the assymmetry of their breasts. what would have been a red dot and a "ha ha i see a zit" reaction is now 100% a pimple and the reaction is more of a "dang, that's a decent sized one" in between a hundred other physical features being noticed

i love it. i've always considered experiencing females to include every aspect of their body, not just the good parts.

>>713890307 (OP)
I can't stop ruining my nose by pushing out my sebaceous filaments

>>713890307 (OP)
banji brehs?

>>713893017
>what would have been a red dot and a "ha ha i see a zit" reaction is now 100% a pimple
A zit and a pimple are the same thing, retard

>>713890307 (OP)
That is a child

>>713894854
deep cut

>>713890307 (OP)
>we could be using modern hardware to have bigger and more detailed levels, better AI, complex combat systems, etc
>it all wasted on graphics that have already been realistic enough since the previous gen

>>713890459

Too bad it's fucking worthless and contributes nothing to art.

Artists have always cared about light and complexion, they never gave a shit about nose hairs or how much facial hair a woman has.

>>713890307 (OP)
lol are those her nose hairs?

>>713894854
Lexee mogged

>>713896025
no, they're mine

>>713894795
same

>>713890391
This will not be noticed subconsciously because in the vast majority of situations you won't be in a position to even have it defined. That's like saying players will subconsciously notice objects under map terrain that are not visible.

>>713897661
You might notice it, but your brain did.

I dunno, you have freaks who notice shit like breast veins. Never underestimate how weird people are.

>>713891282
>>713892490
It's a question of budget allocation and priorities, not pulling some guy from one department to another that he has no experience in, retards. A better phrasing would be "why don't supervisors prioritize funds towards gameplay instead of rendering nose hairs?" and the answer is that it's creatively not challenging to tell someone to render a bunch of nose hairs. There's nothing novel or inventive about the idea of rendering nose hairs, and so you end up with graphically hyperdetailed half-movies where half the time the game tells you to sit down and watch characters talk or maybe hit a button or two for a QTE.

>>713897749
I wouldn't notice, actually, nor would my brain. Or yours because it's not visible in any way at that level of detail 95% of the time.

>>713890307 (OP)
Graphics peaked with late 90s-mid 2000s PC games. Everything after that has been a notable step down.

>>713895820
All of that requires effort and innovation. Why do that when you can just shove bloated textures into the game and sell it as 4k raytraced goyslop to the consoomers.
Game studios don't depend on sales for budget anyway.

Korean artists are pretty fucking talented, same for China and Japan. Most Western artists are nepo babies who can't grasp the fundamentals.

>>713890307 (OP)
>no more room for meaningful upgrades in quality
>still have to find a way to reduce performance and sell more GPUs

>>713891114
Upper management, directors, and producers don't know how to make a good game so instead they try and wow people with GRAFICS. Sony specifically has been pining for giga graphics because it's been their entire shtick for the past 3 decades, so if they back out now they're going to look like even more of a gigantic retard than they already do.