GANBAREEEEEEEEEEEEE
https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/702074/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAVNxAVal1U

>Welp, some retard is spamming gore... Guess our hands are tied and we have to delete these threads instead of just deleting his post :^)

Jannies, these threads should be allowed for the next month, you faggots. Even if it has some kiwitroons in, this is actually important and relevant to games. More relevant than the AIslop you allow.

You are literally in the wrong here. The entirety of /v/ thinks you're in the wrong. Stop being faggots and leave these threads alone.

Also, thank you OP.

Stop killing threads

>>714237321
based post

>>714237321
>The entirety of /v/ thinks you're in the wrong
Do >we though?

Lets save gaming by pushing for an end of life plan that allows fans to keep the game up even when the company doesn't support them anymore.

>>714237427
Yes

>This initiative isn't even certain. It's just to get EU Government to bother looking at it
>Non-EUs can't sign it
You're correct here, /vt/umor
>>EU devs won't be able to EoS a online-only game without significant heads up to potential customers
>EU devs can alternatively EoS a game without issue should they provide a feasible way for consumers to host their own servers
Incorrect here, /vt/umor. It's not "EU devs", it's anyone that wants to have their game on the EU market, which for all intents and purposes means everyone. This is similar to Europe forced gacha games to have lootbox clarity in their regions so now every game has it everywhere, or how Australia forced Steam to allow refunds so now everyone can refund games on Steam.

>AIslop, Gacha threads that are stealth /e/ threads, thinly veiled geo-politics thread
>All Ok
>Thread about a HAPPENING in gaming
>NO THIS IS /pol/!
Fuck the mods, eat my whole ass.

>>714237321
I'm still waiting for someone to explain how this affects America. It's very localized to EU isn't it?

>>714237321
Jannies and mods pretty much always fall for capitulating with terrorism demands and then wonder why their "jobs" are stressful and everyone hates them. Doesn't help their reason is always called in question for their baffling decisions and nobody trusts their judgement

>>714237508
Already explained very helpfully in >>714237467

Stop spamming this shit you nignog.
It won't do anything.

>>714237321

It's gore, but at least it's not pizza.

>>714237321
>>714237502
>>714237525
It's getting deleted because they're being made by vidya butts spammer, who else uses that colored background https://arch.b4k.dev/_/search/boards/v.meta/filename/Frog/type/op/

>>714237508
The presumption is that legislation affecting the European market is sufficient to cause worldwide adoption of the desired business practices. While speculative, it's an educated guess as to how things would work out.

>>714237586
fuck off anon and your gross videos you need therapy

>>714237651
It's not speculation. If lootboxes and refunds were changed with this method, there is no way SKG would be any different.

>>714237508
Like the Apple USB-C thing; trickle down human rights

but will this kill AAA gaming and all the cancer it's bringing over the past 15+ years?

>>714237245 (OP)
Why should developers have to give up their source code just because the publisher shuts down the game's servers? You never have an answer for this.

STOP THE COUNT

>>714237718
they wouldn't

question why are people on /v/ against this is SKG bad? and I'm from America so is there an alt site to help?

>>714237648
Alright, in that case, when this thread gets deleted, I'm making a real one that doesn't have whatever is going on with the background of this one. Hopefully jannies will leave that one alone.

>>714237651
>>714237704
Wouldn't it just give devs an excuse to avoid EU, assuming it actually passes?
From what I gather, this is just for very niche games that are online-only so wouldn't those titles just move elsewhere?

>>714237717
>Can't just pump and dump a game to push out a sequel
>Heavy spending and marketing into new but samey games becomes a bigger risk
>Smaller budget, more riskier games come out to try and captivate the market away from older games
This is the ideal scenario.

>>714237703
I agree. There would be no reason to do things one way in Europe while punishing everyone else.

>>714237718
its not even source code. just include LAN support

>>714237508
Do you think Valve (an American company) decided to start offering refunds because they are ran good people?

>>714237245 (OP)
maybe put the FAQ into the OP next time?
https://www.stopkillinggames.com/faq

>>714237648
there's a function that autobans if you don't have the background when spamming, the first threads didn't have that

>>714237648
Im pretty sure other people other than vidya butts uses that same technique to avoid mods.
Problem is mods were banning threads in the first place which is now making people use this to escape being deleted

>>714237508
If they're going to have to go to the effort of building in functionality that allows future games to continue to be playable after end of service, just for the European market, even if they don't officially endorse it elsewhere, it'll still be usable in the US and the rest of the world. Either because that stuff will end up freely distributed to everyone, or because the European tools will work anywhere, even if they're not officially distributed to any other market.

Can the jannies plese report the anon posting monkey gore to the feds.

>>714237718
There is no answer because there is no such demand, it only exist in your retarded mind.

>>714237638
If it was pizza, the jannies would legally have to do their job and get the thread deleted, so it's better to spam gore.

>>714237796
Why would anyone want to skip the highly lucrative European market? It doesn't make sense. Especially when all that devs have to do is comply with a very reasonable stipulation and provide end of life exits. That is all.

>>714237982
they only deleted the posts last time, not the thread

>>714237796
>Wouldn't it just give devs an excuse to avoid EU
That's a massive market to avoid.

>>714237906
>jannies being useful

>>714237796
In theory yes
In practice EU is a big enough consumer base that publishers would rather take the hit to keep selling there. Making less money is preferable than making no money at all

>>714237245 (OP)
SKG is based and redpilled, only shills and crab bucket thirdies would disagree

back to /pol/ with this trash

>>714237796
the EU is the third biggest market after the USA and China

>>714237906
When they get around to finding the gore posts, they'll just delete the whole thread. How these retards don't understand that they are just incentivizing the gore posters to post gore with that tactic is beyond me.

>>714237787
I dont think we have a real reason why theres specific shitposters targetting these threads. The majority of /v/ is in agreement
but the popularity and this initiative drew the eyes of shitposters who are now spamming CP and gore.

>>714237984
>>714238018
Because it's a live-service game and being able to EoS whenever they want would be more beneficial than whatever long-term revenue they receive?

want to advertise on /v/? buy a fucking ad.
cunt.

>>714237796
Possibly but the EU market is big enough that they would be stupid to.
This is for ANY games that are online only or require phone-home that are sold as goods/products, which is an increasing number.

People coming out who made games to support this is nice.
This guy apparently worked on Black Ops 4 and is doing indie games.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emLWqWAgm2s

So let me get this straight: the people who hate this petition are corpo shills, vtuber simps, gore spammers, and pedophiles? Why on earth would I take their side?

>>714237796
>vtranny
>is retarded
EU is like the 3rd biggest market for videogames, they can't just avoid it
>very niche games
Not even close

>>714237508
The belief is that it will be cheaper to adopt a universal standard rather than make 1 set of rules for your game's end in Europe and another everywhere else.
Kinda like USB-C getting standardized

>>714238125
>1 spammer is making the threads that Jannie's have been taking down
>XX spammers have been filling threads with gore and pizza

>>714238149
So, worst case scenario, the kike games that want to kill themselves get less incentive to get made because they're missing out on one of the biggest vidya markets. That's still an incentive to sign this. Dumb /vt/roon.

>>714238191
why would I join the side of someone who wants to give the government more power?

>>714238191
very good question

>>714237796
That's a load of moneh you're asking to miss out on man

>>714237982
>If it was pizza, the jannies would legally have to do their job and get the thread deleted
This is absolutely not true and I have no idea where you're getting this from unless the OP was already posting CP.

>>714238248
Because they're based