Why doesn't /v/ ever discuss any of the Dragon Age sequels except Dragon Age origins?

>>714268567 (OP)
Dragon Age 2 and Veilguard are so bad they should never be mentioned again.
Inquisition was not bad but had some serious flaws that spoil the whole thing.

>>714268567 (OP)
i think you should make like a dragon age developer and kill yourself. the original dragon age wasnt even that good. it simply released at a time when brown and bloom fps slop was dominating the industry so the idea of a 60 hour traditional fantasy western rpg was highly appealing to the limited amounts of people playing vidya at the time. having ugly elves and a few other woke pieces of fluff was a unique enough twist that we gave it a pass even though it was a stupid idea, but when they kept doing that left wing bullshit in the following sequels we realized that they werent 'trying something new' but were rather forcing through their gay southern california political narrative that nobody actually enjoyed slogging through.

dragon age is just baulder's gate copy and pasted but with antiwhite woke nonsense sprinkled here and there. Each subsequent game piled on more poor decisions as the developers saught to increase their esg score rather than appeal to their core audience.

Move on