>>714285021It holds up in the sense that ME1 is a great roleplaying experience that's bound to a horrid third person shooter gameplay, while 2 and 3 are basically just a more janky Gears of War with more emotionally compelling voice acting and writing.
In hindsight you'll end up admitting ME1 is the best game, but on your first time through you can't really get to ME3 without getting emotionally hooked, unless you already find the story stupid by the time 3 unfolds.
It really differs for some. For me, it's a franchise that superficially gets better but it actually just got worse with each entry, and for others it's a franchise that doesn't get good until ME2 or ME3.
And the ending flops in the sense that it doesn't work as an emotional climax to everything you've done in the third game, and it especially doesn't work well as an ending to all 3 games's narrative, so you're left with "the journey, not the destination" being all you can appreciate it for.
I would say they're good, but you have to be a low-key stupid person to think they're actually good after reflecting upon them. They definitely touch upon moments that just haven't been done by other games. I just don't think those moments elevate Mass Effect as a whole.