Is the Crash N.sane trilogy any good?

>demake
>good
really, nigga?

no

>>714358364

>>714357883 (OP)
it's ok for the first game.
Then 2nd game is an objective downgrade.
Warped was never that good but it's still way better on the PS1, especially the racing and coco levels.

>>714358364
>>714358417
Soul vs soulless IS real

>>714358346
Crash 2 and 3 shitmakes is objectively better than the original. The pill collision box combined with the slide makes it a far more fun and challenging than the originals

>>714357883 (OP)
It's okay but hasn't aged well.

>>714357883 (OP)
>First game
Art direction takes a bit of hit and so does the music, but the improvements to the controls and save system make it a worthwhile version
>Second Game
Butchered. Looks worse, has worse music, controls worse. It's playable, but you're better off sticking to the original
>Third Game
Mixed bag

>>714357883 (OP)
Yes it btfo the original
>>714358364
>>714358417
You can't manual save in og Crash 1 unless you get a special gem. Also checkpoint doesn't save broken boxes.

>>714358364
Very interesting comparison. Remake feels a bit more like a Ratchet environment. Good, but not what the original was aiming for. Strange that the tiki(?) is missing.

>>714357883 (OP)
emulate the originals

>>714357883 (OP)
pretty mediocre, same game without the nostalgia, also limited to 60hz and somehow feels less responsive
thinking of dropping it and just emulating

>>714363340
>thinking of dropping it and just emulating
you should
9 x resolution with PGXP via duckstation looks fantastic

>>714358364
Am I supposed to think top looks better? Why are nostalgiafags so delusional?

>>714364009
>better lighting
>better atmosphere
>crates look better
>actual detail
It's hard to put it into words, but the PS1 version looks and feels better on a fundamental level
The "remake" is just fake shit

>>714357883 (OP)
It's faithful to the original.
Sadly, mechanics of the original game are outdated by modern standards.

>>714364469
It's a fucking platformer, what is jumping not gritty and realistic enough for you?

>>714364009
Am I supposed to think it doesn't? Why are slopfags so delusional?

>>714364512
It's extremely linear, restricted, uninspired (by modern standards) platformer for 5 year olds.

>>714367930
Most platformers are restricted and linear.

>>714367930
>platformer for 5 year olds
Now remind us, who was calling it the "Dark Souls of platformers" again? Oh yeah, GAME JOURNALISTS. Why did grown adults get filtered by this game for 5 year olds? Please explain.

>>714369552
New ones aren't. Not to the same degree.
I'm not saying original game is bad - it was great. For the time.