How much RNG is too much RNG?

>>714363571 (OP)
Please don't play fangames, they hurt Nintendo's reputation.

luck

>>714363571 (OP)
That better not be Mario 3 because that game sucks

>>714363816
it's kaizo mario world 3

it really depends on a lot of factors.
Time commitment is a big one. If a stages takes 30 minutes to beat and the loot you want has a 1% drop that's a load of bullshit and no one wants to bother with that. If an enemy can be killed once per second and has a 1% drop that's a little bit annoying and you might complain if you get an unlucky streak but really isn't so bad.
Another one is severity of a bad roll. If a boss has a certain attack pattern and you can only hit the boss 20% of the time after it attacks that's pretty annoying, but you can keep at it and eventually keep dodging until the boss lets you win. If instead the boss has an attack that's undodgable 20% of the time suddenly it can feel like the fight is more based on luck than skill.

>>714363571 (OP)
>How much RNG is too much RNG?
Anything more than 1.

>>714364556
ok here's a hard boss fight that doesn't involve any RNG