Thread 714499303

when can we expect fully AI generated games? the age of AI is coming whether you like it or not

Fuck off corpo shill

>>714499303 (OP)
It already happened. Take a look to the indie scene. No human input in sight.

>self improving
How long does each new model take to bake again?

>>714502745
>Mobile-tier garbage with little to no animation, and powerpoi-, i mean, """visual novels"""
Impressive, this will feed entire generations in india

>>714499303 (OP)
After the blockchain games.

>>714503216
Wrong fucking screenshot.

>>714502745
>REC2.webm

>>714499303 (OP)
The problem with this Alice is that OpenAI are jewish and they aren't interested in making video games.

>>714499303 (OP)
>She

>>714503354
The way he thinks that sounds wonderful

The fact that no game incorporates LLMs yet as part of the gameplay is such a let down.

>>714505289
It will come but probably not in 2030, that's a bit.. yeah no.

>>714506379
There's not a meaningful way to do it. The characters would just talk, talk, talk without having any bearing on the world. And because of how AI works, you can yes-and them into contradictions that completely shatter the immersion.

>>714499303 (OP)
Hopefully soon so I can play the game I envision instead of the endless AAA slop

>>714499303 (OP)
>whether you like it or not
You should worry about whether I'll buy it or not, and you're not going to like the answer.

>>714508424
dynamic quests anon

>>714509354
Also doesn't work. It just devolves into nonsense.

wake me up when we get an ''ai'' that doesn't just hallucinate things with 100% confidence

>>714509429
it does work, you can fire up an LLM right now and ask it to make a quest and the dialogue and LLMs can code meaning they could have those dynamically created for video games

>>714499303 (OP)
e=mc^2+ai
imagine the games we will have

IM GOING TO ALICE

>>714509742
You're missing the point retard-kun. Those "dynamic" quests you're on about can be cajoled by the player into utterly story-breaking beats. You can make the AI contradict its supposed character. You can have it describe a frigid tundra as "too hot." You can have it tell you anything you want it to, which is not conducive to immersion in a game.

>>714499303 (OP)
Who replaces her ram sticks?

AI will improve
But you won't

>>714509742
Who codes and programs and makes the assets for the said quests?

>>714499303 (OP)
Why are brown people so susceptible to falling for this shit?

>>714510298
Who said we're playing a game with a story? You're just coping and trying to lie about what the technology can do.

>>714506379
You got AI Darth Vader in fortnite and a day later he was already saying nigger

>>714499303 (OP)

Real life is an AI generated game. Go outside and touch grass.

>>714510873
how do I regen?

>>714505289
he's a suit selling an idea to other suits
you think any of those vultures play videogames?

>>714511504
It is a cool idea for video games though. MMOs and Steam and shit have shown that people like to dabble in virtual economies, in some cases
"investing" their own money into them and others making their own money as a result. In the far future when we're all UBI slaves or maybe in a post-scarcity world, those kinds of virtual economies will be how a lot of people find value in their efforts because again, it already exists in current games.

Chinese gold farmers, NEETs selling gold, people gambling on vidya match outcomes, etc. I kinda liked how Tera monetized itself initially, it was buy-to-play and the subscription was something you could buy and then sell to other players. Meaning if you wanted to play for free you just had to grind some reasonable amount of time and then give your gold to someone who had a job irl(couldn't be me). I think that worked well but then they went f2p because it makes more money.