It just keeps getting worse.

Nintendo used shit storage and limited the amount of writes that can be made to it. Every switch 2 is a ticking time bomb.

got any proof?

>>714506290 (OP)
How does this affect you personally, chud?

>>714506290 (OP)

>>714506290 (OP)
What actually constitutes as a "write"? Saving a game?

>>714506290 (OP)
I'm still getting one

How are you coping with the massive success Nintendo is having with Switch 2?

>constantly storing frag data

Nice. Anyone try just maxing the internal out, deleting, and doing the same over and over to see how bad yet?

>>714506290 (OP)
Is this supposed to be a joke about ssd write cycle limits?

>>714506646
Apparently so.

>>714506646
No. The switch is even worse about it.

>>714506290 (OP)
all ssds are like this though

>>714506530
I don't know anything about this, but if it's like NAND, there's a non-infinite number of times a particular sector can be written to before data integrity falls off. It's an insanely large number, and each sector counts separately. So, if you repeatedly wrote noise to the entire drive over and over, it might start to lose integrity after some years. Mind, a save game is going to be written to seperate sectors and they're tiny files so it will take probably hundreds of thousands of saves to actually touch each sector before the drive loops bacl and starts overwriting sectors. The Filesystem abstracts all this so even if you delete or overwrite a save or screenshot/video, the new data is actually written to a new sector and the old data is stricken from the filesystem registry, so it's not like you can obsessively quicksave and accidentally exhaust that sector.

ANYWAYS, when's fucking Elden Ring coming Nintendo?

>>714506934
How so?

Yet another cope thread after trying to push the fake narrative Eurogamer mentioned.
I'm so tired.

https://wccftech.com/nintendo-switch-2-held-back-software-limitations-exfat/
>Unlike Sony and Microsoft, Nintendo keeps a strict limit on how many times a game can write data on the NAND to prevent it from dying too soon, which is thoroughly checked in the rigorous approval process for both new games and updates.

AKA it's actually a good thing. Nintendo has implemented a protection for rogue games wearing our your SSD (which all of are write limited)

>>714507075
It came to me in a dream

>>714506290 (OP)
Lies surrounding the switch 2 are too egregious and so numerous I'm going to guess (((journos))) just found out how nand storage works.

>>714507884
So what?

>>714506290 (OP)
stop exaggerating, no one's falling for it.

>>714507390
I'm guessing this will mostly limit autosave features to not make a new save every minute

>>714506290 (OP)
mid bait, every solid state storage has finite number of writes it can handle before kicking the bucket
pcs, xbox and snoystation use solid state drives too but it's not a problem because the limits are very high and games don't really write any data, they're downloaded once and then only read to run

>>714507390
>>714508519
We arn't in 2002 anymore your SSD will die naturally well before you run out of read/writes, hell you could reach 0% health on them and they will still be working correctly. everything else is just their lifespan.

>It just kee-
BRAAAAAAAAAAP
>N-Nintendo used shit sto-
BRAAAAAAAAAAP
>E-E-Every sw-s-sw-s-switch 2 is a ti-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY

>>714508665
Yeah. I had a first gen ssd die on me within a few years and it was my main drive.
I now run certain ssd's for almost a decade now.
You reaaaally have to push it for it to die and on a console thats not happening soon.

Hell my original xbox hdd still works, dont worry about it

>>714506290 (OP)
wonder if this projecting is from pis5s literally frying themselves causing the liquid metal to leak after enough use

>>714508665
I'm not afraid of the ssd dying prematurely, i'm just speculating that if nintendo did put something in the switch 2 to limit write cycles it would most likely only change how frequently can games auto save.

>>714506290 (OP)
>It just keeps getting worse
Yeah. For you.

>>714509470
considering the usage of "Every switch 2 is a ticking time bomb.". I would say yes, since that is how people have been describing the liquid metal situation here.

>>714506290 (OP)
This is technically true. However nand storage is rated for tens of thousands of writes. And before total drive failure the drive will mark bad blocks stop writing to those blocks. You will also know about impeding drive failure before it happens. When you get too many errors that you the software is corrupted to redownload and reinstall the game. You are exponentially more likely to break your switch by dropping it in swimming pool than you are to have drive failure within a 8 year period.