Do you guys really need to be told how badly this is going to backfire?

please enlighten me

yes, please do tell us

who's the bigger fool, the fool with the idea or the 1 million fools who follow him?

>>714589796 (OP)
Yeah it already backfired really, really badly.

I'm just waiting for a motion to make piracy legal, so I could see all the contrarians in here start screaming their case against piracy.

>>714589796 (OP)
it happening whether you like it or nor corpo shill

>>714589961
>>714589987
>all online games must guarantee 10 years of service upon release
>no online games released due to cost

its not hard to figure out why you dumb fucks

>>714590220
>no online games released due to cost

>>714590220
yeah yeah that's the positive side, what about it backfiring?

>>714590220
I already signed man you don't have to sell me on it. Matchmaking was a mistake.

>>714590220
>Concord would've cost Sony even more money
God I wish.

>>714589796 (OP)
it probably won't result in much of anything. but if the starting point is "game companies pretend to sell you something but they are actually just allowing you to access a game license as a privilege which they can revoke at any time for any reason" any progress is a good thing

Honestly, this campaign is bigger than it feels.

Ross is surprisingly naive. He's literally lobbying to change International law in a multi-billion-dollar industry, targeting ownership rights in the digital age.

But he has the right idea, surprisingly so. If the initiative results in that we 'don't have rights' just like he says, it will make a lot of normies aware of where we stand. It will radicalize them into yet another contentious yet complex topic where WE are getting fucked over.

ACCELERATE.

>>714590301
>>714590359
>>714590404
all games from now on will be single player 200 hour long shopping lists. enjoy the grind kek

>>714590738
so singleplayer games remain the same then

>>714590173
what's happening, though? is the outcome already decided? i can't imagine that a bunch of lawmakers are going to make an informed decision on the intricacies of gaming media. with so much profit at stake lobbyists will be in full force to influence any decision

>He calls pointless online gameplay "Backfiring"

>>714590738
better than live service slop, also just let us make dedicated servers live every old online game did

>>714590738
>Guys people won't just use the server system that they used for decades that was objectively superior in all things except selling hats, and banning people for talking about knee extensions.

>No you HAVE TO play on OUR servers!
>No you CANT MODIFY THE SERVER CODE TO MAKE IT FUN!
>No you HAVE TO STOP PLAYING THE GAME YOU BOUGHT when WE SAY SO!
>No you CANT RIG YOUR SERVER TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY MODS!
>NO YOU CAN'T JUST HAVE A PRIVATE SERVER WITH YOUR FRIENDS!
>NO YOU CAN'T BECAUSE... YOU JUST CAN'T OK!?!?

we need to start a movement called Stop Shilling Games

>UH YOU JUST QUOTED A CRIME STATISTIC AND LAUGHED AT IT!?
>TALKING ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN HOW MUCH YOU LOVE CRIME-AMERICANS IS STRICTLY AGAINST COMMUNITY GUIDELINES!
>BANNE-
>Wha... Why isn't my power working!?

>>714590169
>dude what if they like made stealing leagal, wooah what a great idea, maaaan honest squares would be so triggered!

gamers are saving digital ownership