Did you like the first Wii game developed by Grasshopper Manufacture?

I am a staunch believer NMH should've been a one-off.

>>714644082 (OP)
extremely mediocre gameplay rehash of blood+ one night kiss, heavily reliant on style over substance and an insecure audience desperate to prove "they have mature games too!"

>>714644082 (OP)
FUCKHEAD

yes
>>714644125
I agree but I also like the music in 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFXqJ--L_Kk
never played 3

>>714644082 (OP)
Which version of each game should I play, as a noobie?

>>714644082 (OP)
Some people fuck at funerals, he cuts off heads!

1 was good, but I like 2 more. 3 I dropped in like 2 hours

>destRoʏmᴀɴ...
>Come and get some, fuck!

>>714644125
At this point, yes.
I wouldn't be offended if 2 had been tweaked into a spinoff

>>714644082 (OP)
Absolute kino that I'm glad I somehow managed to stumble into during the Wii years

>>714644125
I kind of agree, 2 is pretty much an antithesis to 1 in terms of how Travis is presented which kinda damages the whole thing. But still, I like it a lot and it shines in certain moments.

On the other hand, NMH3 is pure garbage that makes me doubt if SUDA really wrote Travis strikes again.

>>714644082 (OP)
yes. it's one of the few games i've actually bothered to 100%

>>714644125
it definitely warranted at least one sequel, but none of them came even close to capturing the charm of the original.

>>714644125
2 was olay but not as great as 1. The only Suda game I've liked since is Killer is Dead, and I'm not sure if that was him or the other Grasshopper team.

I was interested in Romeo is a Deadman until it shifted from the weird rotoscoped, pre-rendered stuff to generic UE5.

>>714644082 (OP)
It's overrated but yeah, it's ok.

>>714644125
TSB is actually ok as a spin-off fun little thing, 2 and 3 suck ass tough.

My favorite game of all time there will never be anything like it, it’s perfect
I have a tattoo of the star on my chest
3 fucking sucks balls but plays great
Romeo looks so good