So let me get it straight. I don't own a game I buy if it's a digital copy (license), jew can insert literal spying mechanism years after I bought it, I can lose the ability to play it even if it's a single player game, but.. the stop killing games movement doesn't address any of that?

That's like making a stop raping the corpse once she's dead movement. It seems to miss the bigger picture.

>>715130472 (OP)
You don't ""own"" the game if you buy it physically either.

>>715130472 (OP)
Stop Killing Games has a very specific focus/goal, it's not on them to address the other issues you mentioned (which are all valid concerns). Incidentally, has there been a game that's guilty of all the stuff you listed? I'm curious how widespread all those things happening with one game is.

>>715131632
>I'm curious how widespread all those things happening with one game is.
probably some ubisoft game might have done it

>>715130472 (OP)
Don't post parasites on v. Don't make threads, yiu don't have anything to offerm.

>>715130472 (OP)

>>715130821
Debatable, but companies (currently) have zero way to legally enforce anything regarding whether or not you get to play your physical copy, especially with older titles. For modern titles they would literally have to program planned obsolescence into single player games, which data miners would pick up on long before the game ever hit the shelves.

>>715131632
I'm referring specifically to 2K injecting some gay spying into their games, also watched some video on jewtube some time ago about a guy listing single player physical games that are no longer possible to be played via CD.
>>715130821
You own it more than if it's digital.

>>715130472 (OP)
Why does this NOT look like AI...

>>715130472 (OP)
Of course you own it, you bought it. The license is tied to your social security number. Not just games, but any digital product such as movies, applications etc.

If you only rented something digitally, the maximum price would be something like $5 tops for a brand new game with all the DLC included. You don't rent something digitally for full price.

>>715133318
No, you actually don't. I know, I found out yesterday, the licensing laws for games are peak judaism, suppossedly based on some 1880's laws.

>>715133310
American patriots fact checked it, 100% real

>>715130472 (OP)
Life must be so hard as a mid-wit. How do you even remember to breathe in the morning.

>>715130821
You own the game but not the code, assets, soundtrack, or visual graphics.

How does that work? I dunno, but once I buy a disc I can do whatever I want with it until it's either broken, lost, or stolen.

>>715133310
because it's real, I was the cameraman.

>>715132949
As a kid I always thought she shit herself. Like I knew the joke was that this is a dude, but the visual always made me think it was a huge turd and it was always extra off putting. I think the angle or a lighting change would have helped this shot.

>>715130472 (OP)
>It seems to miss the bigger picture.
That you can't own women if you marry them, it's just a license, and you can lose the ability to fuck her even if you stay monogamous and not cheat, the mgtow movement doesn't address any of that?

Fuck em pirated games last forever. I have a NAS that'll carry me through the apocalypse.

>>715133561
Good point, that's why mgtow is so ineffective.

>>715133435
>mid-wit
>calls you a midwit
nice argument subhuman

>>715133741
Exactly. That's why I started pirating women.

>>715133561
Why would you want a wife, literally anything other than a property owned slave is worthless and you can find that in 90% of the world america is just a backwards shithole run by women and despots that keep those women in soft power.

>>715133820
Unironically historically accurate solution practiced by both romans and vikings

>>715133537
If my dick was about 3 inches bigger i could almost replicate the shot

Don't you get tired of this endless fucking shilling? Holy shit

>>715134139
who's shilling what? If anything I'm pointing out the "grassroot" movement ignores the obvious issues that jew corporations wouldn't want changed

>>715131632
then add goals, what's so hard about this

>>715130472 (OP)
>I don't own a game I buy if it's a digital copy (license)
This is actually not true. In fact, this would give you more rights than a physical version of the game would, as having a license means you are entitled to the game at just about any time, anywhere, in perpetuity.

I never understood why retards are all, "but you don't own the game you own a license!" as if that means I have fewer rights or something. It means I have even more ownership and property rights than before you fucking retards.

>>715137427
The developer cannot insert spy software into your physical disk, they can do that with a digital copy

>>715130472 (OP)
>grassroot movement
Jews who get nothing to lose from making games unprofitable are trying to fuck with jews who get to lose something. That's all thats behind the stop killing my coomer pedo zoophilia neomarxist mutli kulti feminist entertaiinment simulators

>why don't you solve all the problems at once?
Why don't you?

>>715133884
Still practiced today, except we call them passport bros now.

Tuck your dick back like in that pic can you even do it?

>>715130472 (OP)
Who the fuck is this guy? I never seen tuis video.

Anyone who spies on my devices have to get an eye full of middle aged and old women often so I doubt they wanna see that shit

>>715140897
>hey let's make a hysterical name for a movement that ignores the two biggest issues related to the subjeect of the hysteria
I'll explain to you npc, this is how you spot insincerity, ie. inauthentic agenda rather than truth driven behavior.

I pirate everything anyway, the kike corporations can suck my fat nuts

>>715133450
>How does that work?
You own a book, but whats in the book is yours, so you own a copy. Really owning it means you are allowed to make copies and sell them as your own work.
Physical games indeed work the same. You own the right to play it, but you also have the right to sell that right.
Thats the big difference.
And with video games(older ones) you also have the right to keep it as is and not changed by updates etc

>>715141973
You can't sell copies of the book or a game and thats fine. But no one can come and change the content of your book or a game, they can do that to digital copies. That's not fine.

>>715130472 (OP)
Literally none of this shit matters if you just play consoles, emulation/MiSTer, and/or pirate all your PC games.

99% of these issues apply only to modern GaaSlop

>>715133310
Mainly because this is literally what happens. That's his entire career.

>>715130821
Do I really need to buy the whole studio and the whole publishing rights to "own" the game? Just like Microsoft did with Minecraft?

>>715141213
It's about stopping the killing of games...

>>715142491
and the biggest issues killing the games are not extending multiplayer for games barely anyone plays

>>715142671
That's when they're actually killed. So if you're wanting to stop the killing of games; YES.

>>715130472 (OP)
lmao jannies deleted the OP
>>715142737
yes what retard? If you want to stop games from being killed you explain why they are being killed, not pick the 5th point on priority list to push some agenda

>>715133450
I don't know why people make it so difficult, you own a copy of the game, that's it, it's like owning a copy of a book, you can read it or resell it, but you can't make copies and sell it, or claim the writing is yours. It's not that difficult.
Or you own a copy of the game, or you bought a licence to use the software in perpetuity or monthly. You never own assets, Intellectual property or code that would be ridiculous

>>715143282
Exactly. That's what a movement called "stop killing games" should be concerned among others. It's a simple and clear demand that there's no reason lawgivers can't put in action.

>>715142423
Yes, to really own the game as some gamers want you have to buy the company with the IP.
Owning allways meat you own a copy of the game, just because you bought a cartridge from Nintendo now you own Mario and can make games with that intellectual property

>>715137832
>>715142094
Unless you update it or let them do it they can't do shit.
This is only a problem on "Someone else's PC" aka consoles, where you have no control over what the computer does.
>>715141213
>>715142671
Actually addressing the main problem would mean stripping away the vast excesses of copyright and there is massive inertia against that, because no only are there massive, international legal lobbies to blockade that, but nearly all politicians are in the pocket of Big Law in one way or another.
At the very least, we would have to roll back the DMCA (and the prohibitions against messing with DRM), which by now is a massive tool for censorship employed by countless corporations.

>>715143432
Yes, it can be done right, but a lot of people want to expand the definition to something that's impossible. If you define exactly what you want it's less broad

>>715143516
Not true, steam recently updated new 2K spying mechanism. You want to play the game you bought years ago? You have to use their current system.
>>715143593
From what I've seen its way too narrow and dishonest.

>>715130472 (OP)
SKG is a seperate issue from EULA abuse.
EULA's are completely full of shit anyway, full of things that are unenforcible by law. Literally the only reason corpos get away with it, is because they know getting sued for it is unlikely. A) because they know customers are lazy, and B) they try to scare the ones who aren't lazy with "binding arbitration agreements".