Why is this specifically the gaming king of CPUs? Something that consoles will never have like Nintendo, Sony, Xbox, Valve, etc?

Massive cache.
Consolicucks will have something of the sort circa 2035. IF consoles even exist after the 2020s, that is.

Consoles don't need powerful CPU because in 97% cases they're GPU bottlenecked

They don't need hardware because console game developers are smarter than pc game developers so their games are better optimized

>>715292462 (OP)
extremely low latency because do to big pull of x3d cash

>>715293152
Enjoying your AMDip my retarded fren?

I upgraded to an X3D card (not that one in OP) and saw a lot 30-40FPS jump in Tarkov, which is extremely heavy on CPUs

It just works.

>>715293236
i know what you talking about, but it's never occurred, maybe, in some specific games.

if the cache is so helpful then why dont all cpus just be x3d? where is intels counter to this?

>>715295365
>why isn't this on every cpu
Same reason that the 5090 isn't the only gpu being sold. It's expensive and some people won't buy it.
>why isn't intel copying amd
Intel cpus work differently and don't benefit from massive cache the way amd cpus do.

>>715295608
5700x3d can often be found for $260.

i paid $400+ for my quad core intel.

>>715292462 (OP)
playstation will probably have it next generation I assume, unless they're dumping x86. If there is another xbox it will too.

>>715295365
because its only good for gaming

>>715296214
Both sony and Microsoft are working with amd. Ps6 xbox5 will be amd boxs

>>715296210

I could see AMD making a console only version for next gen

>>715292462 (OP)
i feel scammed buying 5800x3d to 9800x3d that cost me $800 and it barely improve gaming on 4k 4090

>>715298001
Should have gotten an Intel Ultra 7 265k

>tfw the upcoming 11800X3D is going to be 12 cores on a single CCD with 7GHz boost
Why can't AMD's GPU division be this cracked?

>>715298738
AMD's CEO doesn't care about GPUs, only the integrated laptop stuff

>>715292462 (OP)
>meme cache that only improves games that already run well over 120fps, but has shittier performance on literally every other application and has zero room for overclocking because the gayass cache is too fragile

>>715299539
>overclocking
Tranny, kill yourself.

>>715298738
AMD saw a major opening against Intel, took it and ran like hell. Independent of AMD doing anything, people were sick of Intel's stagnation and several gens in a row of socket changes for barely any improvements. They haven't really had such an opportunity for an upheaval against Nvidia. They'll need a couple more 5000-tier launches in a row just to get people adequately pissed, and then they'll need some Jim Keller-tier engineering to deliver a plainly superior product on top of that.

>>715292462 (OP)
>saar please to buy the gaming CPU
>you will have the meny muchers frames at 1080p on your rx 6600

>>715299539
Bro your strategy games? Your simulation games? Your whatever the hell Factorio is games?

>>715298738
I doubt anything remotely close to that is on the way.