>almost 2026
>still no budget 4k 144hz monitor

>4k 60hz monitor
>never worry about fps

I have never experienced anything above 75hz. Even the jump from 60hz to 75hz feels big. I fear 144hz may melt my eyeballs in a most awesome way.

I don't see any reason to go beyond 1080p.

>>715317273 (OP)
nothing is optimized to run at 4k 144 hz though?

>>715317273 (OP)
IPS 1080p 60Hz is comfy.

>>715317273 (OP)
explain how it would improve your life, your glasses wearing faggot self wouldnt even be able to detect the change in quality
youre a pathetic crippled faggot, clean your glasses

>>715318868
so what are your thoughts on people with glasses anon?

>>715318939
I think they are nerds that need to be thrown in a locker

>>715317273 (OP)
How poor are you?

>>715318107
Of course you can't see a reason if you've never actually used a monitor above 1080p. Do yourself a favor and never try one, that way you can stay ignorant about how fucking blurry 1080p is

I have many 4k monitors and tv screens but I play all my games on a 22" inch 59hz monitor @ 1920x1080. My current GPU is a 4070ti super. I will never play games in 4k. No point. Only watch movies and videos in 4k.

>>715318868
Having a better screen is nice. People who wear glasses don't see in low resolution. They have slightly deformed eyes, so the light hitting their nerves needs to redirected by the glasses. You ghetto ape.

>>715317273 (OP)
>implying they don't make them for $50 and jack up the price to the moon because gaymers will pay for it anyways

>>715322112
You should start a monitor company and undercut them all, you business expert.
No way someone as smart as you isn't rich.

>>715317273 (OP)
>1080@60
It just works

>>715318107
Ignorance is bliss.

For me, it's curved ultrawide. It just feels right.

>>715318750
Absolutely, anon. There’s a certain charm in simplicity. No coil whine, no babysitting frame rates, just smooth sailing through games and comfy internet browsing. Sometimes I think we peaked with 1080p60 and everything else is just chasing diminishing returns for the sake of spec sheets.

>no budget 1080 oled

>>715317273 (OP)
I got a 35' one for Christmas on sale for like $200 you fucking retard

I too love being able to count the pixels 60cm away from my screen
I too am an ignorant console niggerbrain who believes my plastic shitbox outputs actual native resolution and require an entire dissertation to comprehend the what upscaling is

>>715318107
Because there is no reason. The greatest games of all time run at 640x480. It's basically cope by people who only play GTAV or Skyrim. 4k was meant for movies, to squeeze out a bit more out of 35mm film rescans. HDR, OLED, Atmos, all that garbage was just for bumping 4k movies.

>>715320351
>1080p is blurry
That's not how it works, retard. If you play 1080p content on 4k it needs to make up 3 pixels for every 1 original pixel, and then it probably does bilinear filtering. Also all new displays and tvs have faggot shit like DNR removal which kills the actual original image.

>>715323060
Back in the day Korean companies were doing exactly that. You were able to get quality PLS(Samsung IPS panel) 1440p monitors in the $200-$300 range back in 2013. This was a time where even TN panels of that res would cost $500+

>my $300 4k/1080p dual mode resolution IPS monitor is arriving today

>>715321212
The guy who catches and eats that fish will be forever chasing the taste of it and will never be able to recreate that flavor.

>>715327579
>4k was meant for movies
Yeah, you're braindead. 4k is near worthless for video, the resolvable limit of 35mm film stock tops out about 1440p, and the actual quality of most 35mm film is far below that.

>If you play 1080p content on 4k
I play 1080p content in a 1080p window on my 4k monitor. When it comes to games, old stuff designed for sub 480p is played with CRT filters, while stuff that can handle a resolution bump is played maxed out.

>>715318750
This but you can get a 1080p ips 165hz monitor for about $93-$120

>>715328193
4k/1080p dual mode
how does that work?

>>715317273 (OP)
Usecase?

>>715331420
Most screens are designed for one native resolution. If you use a lower resolution, the screen has to stretch the image to fit, which makes it look fuzzy.

But with dual native resolution monitors, the screen is built so that both resolutions fit perfectly into the screen's pixels. No stretching = no blurriness.

>>715331681
thats pretty cool
ill keep that in mind for when i buy a new monitor in 10 years

>>715331681
That's not how it works. What you're actually talking about is just built in integer scaling, which is nothing new, and most graphics cards support this by default.

1440p@120hz is the sweet spot.

I have been using the same 1440p 144hz monitor for the past like 8 years

I have a M32UC, curved 32 inches, 165hz on oc 4k.
Cost me $700 cad and I got a $200 discount by complaining.
I think it's a good deal but it has ghosting on some games that pisses me off.

>>715331453
Taking 4k screenshots?

>>715317364
Tbqh 50Hz is enough for almost everything.

>>715317910
It's diminishing returns

>>715331925
oh i guess thats not cool then :(

>>715332767
Yeah, the only reason dual native is useful is if you have 2 separate source inputs, and one is locked to 1080p. For a PC monitor, you're just going to run at 4k all the time and do your integer scaling on the graphics card, because the monitor will just add latency for processing delay.

>>715317273 (OP)
Weren't there supposed to be more OLED monitors out by now? I'm pretty sure there were projections for UW 4k monitors being released by now. I guess, at the least, prices have come down to an extent.

>>715332986
Cost of OLED goes up with pixel density. Moreso with AMOLED.

>>715332724
It's not, everything get smoother, I play old shit games in 480 hz and they look incredible.

>>715332724
Not until you hit the 200s, it isn't. You can see a huge difference between 60FPS and 120FPS.
>>715333063
Yeah, I suppose so. I'm at a point where I have a monitor, so I'm not in the market for another. I was just thinking about the projections from last year.

>>715317910
yea its 100 percent worth it
mind blown byhow much of a dif going from 60 to 144 was
now i need to get better hardware so most games run at 144

>>715333232
I don't know who keeps projecting OLEDs are going to get cheaper but it's stupid because every monitor technology gets cheaper at the same speed and then they add some new bullshit which costs twice as much. Quantum dots are pretty cool but you can reach 95% dcip coverage without that shit.
The sick sad true is its very very cheap to make tvs and monitor, but nobody wants to devalue themselves by pulling an RCA.

>that first time you see 1440
>that first time you see 144hz
>that first time you see 4k
>that first time you see >240hz
It feels great to be a pc master race

>>715333997
>that first time you see >240hz
The only one i am missing /v/ btfo on the other 3 so it won't be any diff on 240hz and will kino.

>>715317364
1080p 144hz is better than 4K 60hz. Even browsing the web feels so much smoother

I bought a new 2k monitor last month. It already has 2 dead pixels and the warranty doesn't cover it.

>>715317273 (OP)
you don't need anything over 1080, it's all a scam