>>715412174>but what's the point of having robots in a fiction if they're just people? It's retarded.NTA, but most of my favorite robot fiction uses robots as a metaphor for mankind and man (usually extinct) as a metaphor for a missing creator god. Its a way, as a human viewer (I swear I am not a robot), to step outside myself and think about what life might be life after humanity goes extinct, and think about what responsibilities we have towards the future.
NieR: Automata does this, but the movie A.I. Artificial Intelligence does it too.
And then you have stuff like Bladerunner where Roy kills his creator (Nietzschean allegory).
You have 2001: A Space Odyssey where HAL tries to usurp his creators, and Mega Man where Rock tries to act as an intermediary between humans and rebelling robots.
This is all very rich territory for metaphor and depth of thought.
in the movie A.I. Artificial Intelligence, there is a horrible subtext that mankind drove itself to extinction with sex bots interrupting the natural drive for human families, and the robots are left with a desire to love their creators, physically as well as evolving the capacity for higher forms of love, and no creators are left to be loved. So in that case, the robots being appealing is a direct plot point...