is this really what the "stop killing games" retard want. The return of Battleborn and Concord when nobody asked for it?
There is not a single dead game that deserves to live.
Failed 5 billion live service games bring down the companies that make them and so they should continue to exist to ruin ubisoft, EA, sony and whoever thinks its a good idea to slop them out.

I'm pretty sure concord refunded everyone who bought the game

We signed it already, give up.

Thanks for making threads and keeping SKG relevant! We couldn’t do it without you.

>>715516215 (OP)
Filth like that wouldn't even make it into production if devfucks thought die a second that they'd be legally required to actually support their own games and respect their customers.

>>715516215 (OP)
The most worst case scenario is that companies can acquire defunct IP and push patches to disable those games or litigate against third party servers keeping them functional.
There is no inherent obligation or incentive to keep even functional games functional.
The press is always hungry, but the press must always be kept in a state of starvation or it will kill us all.

>>715516461
Why not kill it first?

>>715516215 (OP)

>>715516215 (OP)
those games are dead for some reason, the movement begin with ubislop racing game being out of services and these morons chimped out, then some other niggerfaggottroonwomen game being taken down and they are taking offense for that, saying that we have to go hand in hand in rescuing those garbages from eternal fire. literal group of retards being operated by a retarded youtuber

>>715516215 (OP)
>You want games that you bought to be in a functional state after the devs cut off support, through means like dedicated servers?
>WELL THAT OBVIOUSLY MEANS YOU WANT TO PLAY CONCORD AGAIN!!

>>715516560
what am i misunderstanding?
The entire spark that started this was a fucking ubislop title.
You want objectively bad games to outlive their welcome because you feel cheated when everyone else can see that you are simply too dumb to make financial descisions.

>>715516215 (OP)
>The return of Battleborn and Concord when nobody asked for it?
If no one asked for it then why do you get mad over a hypothetical? it sounds like you want people to not own whatever they buy stupid fat faggot Jason

>>715516461
No
The most worst case scenario is the EU rapes everyone in the ass, which is also the most likely scenario

>>715516756
Companies have more incentive to actively remove good games or C&D modding and maintenance efforts.
Bad games are likely to still outlive their welcome, because they don't compete with anything.

>>715516796
in this hypothetical scenario you cant name a single "dead" game that is worth of the effort to go through this political clownery.

>>715516831
This is already happening due to global IP law, aka a failure of the France containment zone, you are simply rejecting the use of lubricant.

>>715516908
CSGO
Old builds of TF2/ Source games
Brink
The Culling

Always-Online will be illegal in your lifetime.

>>715516908
>You can't name old games this happened to that are good so this practice becoming much more widespread and starting to affect games I like isn't worth fighting

>>715517120
>CSGO
>old builds of games
still exists and this is out of the scope of your retarded idea So what now? Stop killing games is also "stop updating games"?
>brink, the culling
shit game or show me otherwise.
>>715517252
one game and you cant do it.

>>715516215 (OP)
Wanna know what the beauty of game preservation is?
it's that your opinion on it doesn't matter in the least.
You loving or hating the game makes no difference, the point is preserving it for people to see and experience instead of simply eliminating it from history.
Battleborn may not have been a good game, but it wasn't total shit either, it had plenty of creativity to show, even if most of it was cringe and chasing trends / pop culture.

Just because you hate something doesn't mean it shouldn't exist,
it needs to be saved so future generations can use it as a reference on what to do and not to do, what is fun and what isn't, and what is corporate greed and what isn't.

I'm asking for the return of Batleborn!
You fuckers have no idea how fun my girl was to play
The campaign was littler just 8 hours of pure fun with insane replay value since you could run it as any dude
Imagine an 8 hour pve campaign but you can pick any OW hero to run it as, it's discount that.

>>715516869
what good game has bern removed by these practices???

>>715517530
>>715517554
>the retards that celeberated concords not even 2 weeks of existence are now begging for its return
absolutely retarded schizophrenia

>>715517606
The original Warcraft 3, from the top of my head
Didn't they practically replace it with the demaster?

>>715517650
>I want to replay Battleborn
>lol y do u wanna play concord?
Absolute retard
Don't ever reply to me again.

>>715517396
Why bother. You'll just call it shit regardless.
Here, have an incomplete list of dead games. Now you can insult them all more effectively.
https://stopkillinggames.wiki.gg/wiki/Dead_game_list

>>715517675
stop killing games is now "stop updating games!" goalpost shift

>>715517650
Just because I didn't want it to succeed doesn't mean I want to erase it from existence, or remove access to it from people who bought it

What is this mindset? what kind of child wants to take away rights from others just because:
>b-but you think a game failing is funny, so therefore no game should ever be preserved!

>>715516215 (OP)
>The return of Battleborn and Concord when nobody asked for it?
No, since those games would be exempt from the law, since they already released and died, but if there's quite literally a single human being that wants to play those games, the games deserve to be kept alive, even if it's in a single server in some random dude's basement in kazahkstan.

>>715517801
>what kind of child wants to take away rights from others just because
are you not the kind of person that gets triggered by a rainbow flag? You are so schizophrenic and full of hypocrisy, it hurts. And you are still unable to name ONE single game

>>715517736
Nigga, OSRS was replaced by RS3 and people hated it so much they brought OSRS back
It's not about not updating games, it's about keeping the game people liked

If you have a version A that people like (IE cube world alpha)
and then you have version B that people hate (like the "full release" of cube world)
Do you think it's justified to destroy the one that people liked and paid for?

>>715517650
I want all games, good or bad to be immortalized. Concord is one of the greatest flops of all time. If for no reason other than historical significance, it has even more of a right to be preserved than other games.

Stop killing games does not go far enough, either. I wish game patches were subject to the same level of version control that software is and the consumer had access to all of it. Steam depots just aren't even close to enough.

>>715516215 (OP)
>nobody
And who made that reborn project? Even concord had like 12 players. Every game being available forever incluides the shit ones too, even those have an audience.

All "community revival projects" flop in one month

>>715517942
>you are still unable to name ONE single game
Every single game ever made that is unplayable, unpurchaseable and unredeemable

Why is it so hard for you to comprehend that the point isn't preserving good games, but preserving what people paid for?
Why is it so hard to understand that it's not about "saving games" so much as it's about not destroying history, evidence and customer rights?

>>715516215 (OP)
It's not retroactive

>>715517606
TERA
OW1
maplestory 2

It's funny how corpo shills are incapable of finding any arguments against SKG so they just bitch and moan like twitter roasties.

>>715518302
its funny how you cant name one single game that needs to be saved or revived.

>>715516215 (OP)
Good morning sirs

>>715518337
Dark Spore
Fusion Fall
Club Penguin
TERA
Toon Town
Actual classic WoW
Original Realm of The Mad God

>>715518337
All of them. Including all patches, and all versions of them.

>>715518493
>MMOs need to have a single player version
lmao kill yourself
>>715518521
cant name a single one.

>>715516908
Darkspore

>>715518631
>MMOs need to have a single player version
or.. you know.. private servers?
Stay seething, every stance you have is worthless, and every point you try to make is weak

>>715518631
>name games that have to be saved or revived
>NOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT!!!
Also Titanfall 2 should be preserved. Good time to mention that when the game's servers went down and the game was unplayable, the fans kept it alive.

>>715518928
>the fans kept it alive.
This is also a precarious position for no good reason. The IP holder could C&D fans for trying to maintain the game after they themselves refuse to support it anymore and that's just retarded.

>>715518631
>single player version
No they need to have private servers you fucking moron
>REEE MUH CONCORD
They refunded that shit dumbass, they're off the hook for that failure.

>>715518631
>>MMOs need to have a single player version
No, we'll just take the server binaries, no patching necessary :)

>>715519036
The IP holder could hold my nuts

>>715519036
Yes, just like how it happened to Open XCOM, and Doom modding, and Far Cry, and Jagged Alliance 2, and Unreal Tournament, and Quake 3, and Diablo 2, and...

>>715518786
>i want to play my shitty EA game that i have been warned of before buying that they can steal my money
i think the initiative you need is "Stop buying EA games"
>>715518907
>>715519087
>>715519124
WoW private servers exist, so I guess it doesnt count.

It looks to me that you all are in dire need to be educated on how to spend your money if thats the best of the best games you can tell that need to not die.

>>715516215 (OP)
why are you indian?

>>715516215 (OP)
For anyone actually reading this thread, any games that have released before any SKG legislation is made (if any is made) are not required to adhere to it. So no, we're not getting dedicated servers for battleborn/concord

>The return of Battleborn and Concord when nobody asked for it?
I can see a /v/ Concord server where everyone play as Bazz

>>715519436
>please ignore the issue!
No.

I don't get why people are so desperate to get shit on by corpos
It's YOUR money these people are stealing, why are you ok with that?

>>715516908
All of them. All dead games are worth the effort. Not any one individual one, but all of them.

Battleborn was ok
Just ok not great not good

>>715516215 (OP)
I don't know about concord, but some people still want to play battleborn. You've even seen them on /v/ before. If there are people who want to play a "defunct" game, whatever it is, I think they should be welcome to it.
I fucking hated that game personally, but I don't need the policy to apply only to games I like, since I'm not an insecure turd like OP.

>>715517252
But this isn't going to happen to games I like doe