Thread 715532674 - /v/ [Archived: 314 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:44:28 PM No.715532674
a800519d7edd5a915397820dcd68df42
a800519d7edd5a915397820dcd68df42
md5: 550310d330648e7c9b158a861bea8ae2🔍
Favorite video game character?
Replies: >>715532712 >>715533204 >>715533247 >>715533352 >>715533950 >>715533984 >>715536996 >>715539661
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:45:04 PM No.715532712
>>715532674 (OP)
>70% legs
kek
Replies: >>715532898 >>715533841
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:47:51 PM No.715532891
96984357_p0
96984357_p0
md5: c84fcb65d8add6df58e12b115276870f🔍
Marnie
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:48:01 PM No.715532898
file
file
md5: 7fc0ffed9f5c3beb7dafbb45969848f5🔍
>>715532712
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:51:48 PM No.715533163
1752586228080371_thumb.jpg
1752586228080371_thumb.jpg
md5: 504ee31dcccfcf746f2b75536be5d09a🔍
tao
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:52:35 PM No.715533204
>>715532674 (OP)
it's been a long day...
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:53:09 PM No.715533247
>>715532674 (OP)
PEKO
PEKO
PEKO
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:54:31 PM No.715533352
>>715532674 (OP)
What video game is this slutty bunny from?
Replies: >>715533716
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:59:44 PM No.715533716
>>715533352
The best game ever, Death Stranding 2.
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:01:08 PM No.715533841
>>715532712
and 100% of muh deek, yes
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:02:34 PM No.715533950
>>715532674 (OP)
Who is this cutie?
Replies: >>715534014
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:03:04 PM No.715533984
>>715532674 (OP)
konpeko konpeko konpekoooo!
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:03:24 PM No.715534014
>>715533950
>doesn't know peko
Lurk 2 years before posting newfag
Replies: >>715534103 >>715534225
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:04:38 PM No.715534103
>>715534014
That's just a random anime rabbit girl, calm down.
She graduates in two weeks btw
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:06:11 PM No.715534225
>>715534014
Doesn't even look like her overdesigned avatar, vtranny
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:06:58 PM No.715534276
45
45
md5: b96edc3b55026f24a02a6fff8621af42🔍
>girls with this body never have big boobs because it's physically impossible
>anons claim they don't like fake boobs or "insta thotts"
lmao yall are stupid
Replies: >>715535005 >>715535942 >>715536121
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:16:57 PM No.715535005
>>715534276
>that broad upper torso
As hard as they try, industry whores can never compete with natural beauty.
I like her ass/legs though.
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:30:23 PM No.715535942
file
file
md5: d2c11718c2821215457ec59d9f47aed7🔍
>>715534276
>overfilled lips
yeah, those tits aren't real buddy, which invalidates your argument. However, there ARE thin-framed women with large breasts, they are just very rare and (a lot of the times for some stupid reason) seek breast reduction eventually. picrel, Solomia Maievska, russian smut model, yes, she got a reduction a few years ago, but the fact remains, such bodies are possible without cosmetic enhancement, just extremely rare
Replies: >>715539454 >>715539792
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:32:57 PM No.715536121
>>715534276
What the fuck is wrong with her face
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 5:46:08 PM No.715536996
158718647176
158718647176
md5: 436c7fb8511c1d4d3c09236b30011879🔍
>>715532674 (OP)
>Small ass body.
>Long ass legs and clown platforms.
This fag need to learn about proportions.
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:10:42 PM No.715538896
why are long legs so attractive?
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:18:46 PM No.715539454
1751502894661579_thumb.jpg
1751502894661579_thumb.jpg
md5: 5e5b36710fcd416936b74728024ff61c🔍
>>715535942
>She had a breast reduction
It's all so tiresome
Replies: >>715539794
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:21:17 PM No.715539661
>>715532674 (OP)
L E G S
E
G
S

HOLY SEX
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:22:50 PM No.715539792
>>715535942
It seems like it's always Russians. There must be some genetic factor at play here.
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:22:55 PM No.715539794
>>715539454
I don't get it either
>win the literal 1:500,000,000 genetic lottery and be gifted an immaculate pair of tits with a small frame
>cuts them off despite building her life around her body
I wonder if the endless breast-focused attention does something to them, like makes them crave reducing them to see if people still love them just as much regardless of their breast size, like a test of their intrinsic worth vs extrinsic features. It definitely seems pathological due to the rarity of such bodies combined with the proclivity for them to seed out reduction.
Replies: >>715540065 >>715540329
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:26:31 PM No.715540065
>>715539794
>heres genetic access to the easiest possible way to make lots of money with minimal effort.
>cuts them off
Woman will always be just too retarded to really succeed without men wont they?
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 6:30:05 PM No.715540329
1920px-Survey-survey.svg
1920px-Survey-survey.svg
md5: 2cd7f985b6bd227a7a70483c65641619🔍
>>715539794
I think it's more likely that the increased visibility of big titty women on the internet makes us more likely to see them getting breast reductions and thus consider it common. When in reality most of them are probably given to average looking hags and fat women with back problems, but we never see them because they don't advertise themselves all over the internet.
There's also sampling bias. if you polled 100% of e-thots and asked "would you ever get a breast reduction?" almost all would say "No" because they'd never need one in the first place. Of course the e-thots with ZZ-cup gigamilkers that give them spinal deformities by age 30 would respond "yes" at a higher rate.