i'd rather fap to custom udons or the dozens of sad pandas or hundreds of cunny scenarios in sillytavern why is this one series so overblown, it's not that high quality, it's basic, serviceable lolishit
>>715790280 what are you getting all worked over something else? poster said "poggers" a literal cross site cancer and newnigger lingo speech. OP showing a shitty website filled with fucking malware. you're done
>>715790264 Wow really anon with the hard R?????? im not new here 2007 actually and im sooo sorry i don't know about these horrible sexual deviant terms :'(((((
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 1:50:06 PM No.715790607
>>715790436 just letting you know, it just turns out that the clownsident of the cucked golems of muttmerica rapes kids
>>715790723 i would vote for Trump again look around buddy with him around, theres no more WOKE biden is the real pedo in all of this he liked how the little boys hair brushed over his leg
>>715790104 Full loli OVAs are few and far between. It makes sense that some people are excited for it. That said I haven fapped to OVAs in a very long time. Custom Udon sucks too since he doesn't add voices to his animations.
Neat, I guess. Let me know when the next Chiisana Succubus drops.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 2:37:32 PM No.715793034
>>715792857 i'm waiting for the senile old fuck to start saying things about wanting to lower the AOC, it would honestly be less sus than the shit he's been rambling on about
>>715792625 >Dev disappears I wish this was more fleshed out and some of the uglier AI art replaced. Her scene art need to be consistent too, some of it was ugly like the standing one and anal (if I recall, it was the one that had her with shoes or something it was weird)
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 2:41:43 PM No.715793259
>>715793138 funfact: 16 year olds can be conscripted in the UK, too
>>715791516 >Custom Udon sucks too since he doesn't add voices to his animations I don't think he needs to. Besides, all the general hentai with voices never really match up to the visuals and it takes away more than it adds. Usually.
>>715793138 >recently lowered the voting age to 16 Bong here. Not yet, it's still in the proposition stages. I'd also at that this isn't a new thing. The discussion re: lowering the voting age to 16 has been off-again-on-again for as long as I can remember (born 1990). They argument bascially boils down to: >At 16 you're old enough to work full time >You also pay taxes on your work >You should therefore be allowed to have a say in how your taxes are spent