>>715812120I hope they decide something you like is immoral next
Seems like they are only going after pedophilic content. I'm not gonna get mad about this. In fact, I'm gonna remain apathetic and indifferent.
>>715812349games like GTA are next on their agenda
>>715812404Oh no, muh DEI race mixing slop games, the horror
>>715812358only a matter of time until someone puts a butthole in there
>sharty zoomers reveal themselves to have the same exact beliefs as radfem antigamer foids
LOL
>>715812023 (OP)AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I AM WOMAN, NO MORE GOONING AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH
>>715812467theyโre also going after pong citing the balls are forcibly being played with.
>inb4 muh dei slop pajeet do not redeem
Aren't these guys like a mormon psyop thing
>>715812615>muh nepo trust fund baby slopOh no! Oh god no no no no no!
Kill degenerates with sick fetishes and use their entrails as an alternative fuel source. They contribute nothing to an overcrowded society.
>>715812467not just GTA, but any game featuring or depicting violence against a woman in any perceivable way
Their endgame is literally just banning porn and sex so much that men not only have to go outside, but they also have to actively break into their houses and fuck them, since they're on the internet being activists all day.
>>715812706radfem TERFs larping as christians
>>715812809imo women shouldn't be in games at all. No matter how they are depicted. So this is a good start.
>>715812023 (OP)WE ARE SHOUTING COLLECTIVELY BECAUSE WOMEN ARE FED UP
>>715812023 (OP)you won't do shit niggerfaggot
>>715812962Nah, it's definately bad. But threatening to remove disgusting ass roasties from my mil sim games is the opposite of bad. Women should be making babies, not fighting.
>>715812023 (OP)more like collective shit
>>715812745start by killing yourself first sharty
Listen I get rape and loli stuff but why incest? What's so immoral about consensual incest depictions? Obviously i understand the stigma in real life and the results of inbreeding but that's not what I'm asking. Isn't every pornsite full of incest fantasies? It's fairly normalized
>>715813295Nope, women shouldn't be seen or heard. Their only job is to carry babies and make sandwiches.
>>715813379Apparently the collective are Australians, and Australians are dumb as a pile of rocks. There is no logic to it. Like the rest of their shitty country.
>>715813456I don't even enjoy incest porn but that doesn't mean it's immoral. Replace the question with scat it's the same shit. Why are there people concerned to which odd consensual fantasy people jerk off to? Are footjobs okay? Where is the line drawn here
>>715813379most of sexual abuses happen in the family circle
>stop killing games censoring GaaS games
good
>collective shout censoring goonerpedo games
bad
>>715813661Right but is incest porn typically about sexual abuse? Most I've seen is just
>step mom is horny again
>>715813661Why not do something to fix the issue irl instead of targeting fiction?
>>715813889the fiction inspires real action
>>715813825the difference is that NOBODY wants GaaS slop
>>715813889Because they like it when it happens irl. It's onr of those open secrets I think. That's just a guess. Who really knows.
>>715813954>super mario bros is going to make children jump on their dogs!get out of here, jack thompson
>private islands existing solely for the purpose of abusing real children: i sleep
>kikes fucking children in the tunnels underneath a major american city: i sleep
>an entire animal torture fetish industry (the foundation of all future serial killers, mass murderers and pedos, and also a purposely protected and widely supported israeli/kike psyop) with serious ties to child and human trafficking rings: i sleep
>naked pixels resembling humans: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE OY VEEEEEEY SHUT IT DOWN NOW
>>715813954No it doesn't you fucking idiot, unless you're a weak minded individual who can't tell fiction from reality that is.
>>715813887>>715813889cause they don't want to check on every single shitty game to see if the characters depicted are +18 and consenting. That's the main reason they ban these games actually.
>>715813864>>715813762To the guys from the other thread who were asking for evidence of MTR being extremely christian, I was taking a dump and couldn't reply in time:
https://www.abc.net.au/religion/when-it-is-ethical-to-disclose-your-religion/10100798
I was busy taking a dump
>>715814151But they're banning loli and rape specifically. Wouldn't that already cover all the cases? Why blanket ban incest on top of it?
>>715814208kek turns out woke right was the apt term after all
>>715813642Banning foot nigger shit would be a blessing.
gooners are plague
remove gooners
gas gooners
headshot gooners
>>715814208They're not religious, they just use whatever ideology they can to ban shit.
Horrid cunts who should all get a bullet.
>>715814251because incest ranges from:
>adult man fucking his step-auntto
>adult man raping a loliand they are not going to check on every single incest game to verify which is which
>>715814493Could just be a gaslighting lefty troon. Trying to make people hate religious fags by pretending to be insufferable.