How do you refute this?

https://files.catbox.moe/z9dac0.png

DK is a grown ass gorilla. There's the difference

>>715884742 (OP)
I- I can't...

I want to ____ Poppy

>>715884742 (OP)
Link to the yt video? Wanna see the comments

>>715884742 (OP)
holy based
can we see the rage from the replies?

>>715884742 (OP)
One's an ape. Apes are allow to be naked since their lower intelligent animals.

A woman is smart with ethics and morals. DK is a fictitious interpretation of an ape that has morals and values because it's a video game and the image of a nude ape has been acceptable into the general conscious of society due to how animals are portrayed.

Basically you're a pedo, kill yourself.

>>715884770
>>715884742 (OP)
Needs anatomically correct genitalia both for Kong and the girl.

>>715885290
>A woman is smart with ethics and morals.
Citation needed.

>>715885392
>Chud response

You will never have sex.

>>715884742 (OP)
I ask why he wants the child to be naked

s everyone on the internet these days mentally 12 years old in the body of an adult?

>>715885229

>>715885290
>are allow
>their
>lower intelligent
>A woman is smart with ethics and morals
this is bait

>>715885483
YWNBAW

>>715885539
anon, you're just trying to keep this thread bumped, aren't you...

>>715884742 (OP)
>casual pedophilia begging
Bald white dudebros at it again jfc

>>715885481
Topics that relate to a child's sexuality are always immediately met with thought terminating cliches.
Not as though you'd expect intelligent discourse in YouTube comment sections, but there is virtually not a single platform left where you can talk about it in earnest.

>>715885595
No, you're just a retard who fixates on minor grammar mistakes to disregard anything like every cum guzzling retard on /v/

You can't, checkmate. Nintendo has no choice but add a nude option for Pauline now.

>>715884742 (OP)
Because Pauline has body type B

>>715885724
MANY are saying this.

>>715885647
stop being a nonce, m8

>>715884742 (OP)
rules are for thee not for me.

>>715884742 (OP)
Little girls should definitely be ashamed of their filthy naked bodies.

>>715884770
Small, cute, soft, smooth...

>>715885647
>child's sexuality
>intelligent discourse
Are you fucking retarded, pedo? Fuck off

Are the only fans of this game pedophiles?

>>715884742 (OP)
Why would gorilla need clothes to begin with?

>>715886082
To look sharp? Not all of us are jobless NEET

>>715886017
I know someone who is not a pedophile and likes this game.
He's into babies, though, not sure if that counts.

>>715885049
play mario kart as

>>715886121
I think it counts, but I'm no expert.

>>715886121
>He's into babies, though
WTF that's way worse.

>>715885647
>child's sexuality
How to say you're an unironic pedophile without saying you're an "unironic pedophile".

>>715884742 (OP)
They could have at least done a bikini.

>>715885828
>>715885858
>>715886464
What's with these bot posts? You're proving his point.

>>715884742 (OP)
I can't get all the ironic weeb wanking around kid Pauline. I'm down for good loli content but she has the ugly westoid loli look to her like she jumped straight out of a Shadman drawing.

>>715884742 (OP)
>>715884742 (OP)
no he's right

>>715886592
Water quality plays a secondary role during a drought.

>>715886224
Did they HAVE to make the ape so sexy?

>>715886550
>Anyone that disagrees with me is a bot.
It's the wording. Lamenting how there's no intellectual discourse around sexualizing children isn't the way a mentally sound person would broach the topic.

>>715884742 (OP)
because pauline is a human
>>715885290
technically speaking, humans are classified undet great apes

>>715886747
Did you read the full sentence? You are employing thought terminating cliches in a post that criticizes thought terminating cliches.
Jesus, zoomers are braindead now.

>>715886550
There's no "debate" to be had. Stop being a nonce.

>>715885647
>>715886702
True...

>>715886857
If you have a point you want to make just make it, don't cry about people being uncomfortable talking about sexualizing children and then get pissy when people make fun of you for your crying.

>>715885828
>>715885858
>>715886464
really brought out the reddit with that one
>suddenly

>>715886550
Dead Internet theory is real.
Except, instead of being bots, you're talking to low IQ cattle who have never held an original opinion in their life.

>>715884742 (OP)
With people like this around I'm not sure if increased internet censorship is really a bad thing.

>>715884993
It's implied he's "teenage" in this one.

>>715884742 (OP)
No fur to hide naughty bits.

>>715888558
She's 13, so she probably does have "fur".

>>715885647
What is there to talk about? You wouldn't expect any human nudity in a game intended for children. You wouldn't expect child nudity in anything. OR at least you shouldn't.

The nude thing on DK is a joke, as cartoon animals are often given articles of clothing but generally aren't given anything to cover modesty. It's just a "he looks the same" joke.

>>715885832
They should be aware of how to protect their modesty, otherwise pedos would harm them. (not you, but there are a lot of truly sick fuckers out there that would)

>why can't I have sex in my children's game?

Is this the thread?

So are people avoiding this game because of how it's the most sexually charged Nintendo game of all time? Or will it be a best-seller because a lot of people like this stuff? And why wasn't it given an AO rating for having the most sex appeal out of any game outside of Blue Archive? I mean, it's a child, with exposed f**t. Like, what the fuck?

>>715888949
This is the new Video Game Movement. They convince you that gaming is a political movement and that includes sexualizing minors. This is why they get all political when shit like Blue Archive gets banned. They truly, genuinely want video games to turn into a movement that fights on behalf of lowering the age of consent or something. And they'll contaminate any online space to push their agenda.

>>715889005
>it's the most sexually charged Nintendo game of all time?
How can you say this when Bayonetta exists?

>>715884742 (OP)
Because she's a human kid you fucking weirdo.

>>715885290
both are apes

>>715886017
Most people on here are sexually, socially, and by extension morally starved. They're not true pedos but entertain the idea of being one because it "sticks it" to the society that they perceive to despise them.

The anti pedos on here are the same too but they take the other side to create conflict, because that's something they need.

In other words, most people need to get off this website and get therapy.

>>715889109
Because Bayonetta doesn't expose her f**t like Pauline does.

>>715885828
nonce more like yesnce

>>715884770
Casy came through!

>>715886464
Children DO have a sexuality at all though, and as a parent it is important to understand it, in order to protect and guide them.

>>715889285
She exposes a lot more than that. I don't see Bananza videos get age restricted and even removed from YouTube for nudity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-k-hrRFiHA

>>715885481
Exactly what I expected.

Martyred himself for the greater good. Praise be to those who thumbs up'd it.

>>715889005
Splatoon is EASILY more sexually charged than this.

That one does low-key sexualize young teenage girls in their design, only a year older than Pauline is meant to be in some cases.

>>715889517
Then why does everyone on /v/ act the way they do?

>>715884742 (OP)
He's right you know

>>715885290
>One's an ape. Apes are allow to be naked since their lower intelligent animals.

And women aren't?

>>715884742 (OP)
DK will never know the Kingdom of Heaven. Pauline however is pure of heart and preordained to know salvation through the word of God.

>>715889814
Koko the Gorilla had an IQ of 95, which is higher than the average IQ of all of sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia.

>>715889606
>Splatoon is EASILY more sexually charged than this.
This.
And people love the squid kids.

>>715889606
splatoon 3 removed hips and tits from girls

>>715884993
But he is in front of a child.

>>715890037
Doesn't the IQ test require the ability to read though?

How did they test the Gorilla

>>715885473
There's a reason nerds ran to the internet: Normalfags are insufferable and even other normalfags find them miserable to be around. This has always been the case. It's just IRL Normalfags would speak with their fists and beat each other into a pulp to communicate, but online they kvetch over shit nobody cares about like how old a cartoon character is.

>>715884742 (OP)
Maybe she's not ashamed of it but Nintendo might be...

>>715885648
Minor is an understatement. Go back to school.

>>715890156
Estimated by her use of sign language and understanding of English.

>Pauline talks about random things every time the both of you go to sleep
>One of the stories she tells is she had a dream she was covered in chocolate from head to toe, and DK ate her
I think it's disturbing how dangerously close this game gets to pedo shit. Knowing Japanese culture you know for a fact there's developers on the team that are implementing Pauline stuff for twisted reasons. Especially some of the costumes in the game.

>>715885647

You missed the point, midwit. If DK can be naked without any implied sexuality then the same should be true of Pauline.
Nude != sexual.

>>715888704
>You wouldn't expect any human nudity in a game intended for children.
I agree, but that guy wasn't expecting child nudity in a Nintendo game, he was questioning society's engagement with nudity in general, albeit within the framing of dark humor. "There is nothing to be ashamed of your body" is a legitimate sentiment held by millions of people, yet we treat child nudism very differently from adult nudism.
I live in Germany where nudism is much more lax and we have sizable nudist cultures. There is generally no sexual element to nudism.

"People" got triggered the fuck out of me saying that children have sexuality; so if it's a commonly-accepted fact that children are not at all sexual, then why make such a fuss about child nudity? I am guilty of it myself. I berated my 10 year old female cousin when I was 14 for taking off her top outside at night since she got it wet.
She cried to her parents and I got scolded by my parents for instilling fear in her, and was told that it wasn't a big deal for girls her age to be topless.

DK isn't really naked though. He's wearing a tie still.

>>715890843
>was told that it wasn't a big deal for girls her age to be topless.
Well, they don't have tits, so they have nothing to hide.

>>715890916
So put Pauline in just a tie.

>>715890556
Human nudity IS sexual though. We instinctively perceive it as such.

Children, and teenagers in particular need to understand this, as if they show their private bits they will get attention from all the wrong kinds of people, and they could be harmed, both physically and mentally.

>>715890517
haha

that's weird!
I wonder what she tastes like

Is there a japanese voice option for pauline in the english release?

>>715891105
There's like ten voice options you can change at any time. I like cycling through them.

>>715884742 (OP)
There's nothing for her to be ashamed of, but for you as the player on the other hand..

>>715891395
When you realize the true reason for Pauline being barefoot, (You) will be ashamed of your words and deeds.

>>715891529
She left the house without shoes? Not hard to visualize.

>>715891395
This is true, people are misinterpreting how she should feel about her body and what they want to see.

Adult eyes should not be looking at nude children, for obvious reasons.

>>715891395
>but for you as the player on the other hand..
Ashamed I can't have those feet on my face?

>>715890517
When you are changing pauline's outfit, she strikes various poses that show off her feet. A lot of the outfits are also excessively inappropriate.
I am not a retard. I can tell it was made by pedos

>>715891031
And you still don't get it. How can the game justify saying that there's nothing wrong being naked but not allowing pauline to be naked

>>715884742 (OP)
Jews don't sell prime gorilla pussy, so DK is allowed to be nude.

>>715885423
Marry yourself roastie.

>>715889372
>>715890843
Ah yes I am sure this is the intent of these gentlemen here advocating for naked children in video games. They just want to help parents teach their children about sexuality! It's 100% not some pedo that faps to loli and possibly even the real deal.

>>715891871
Most of them are joking but I imagine if you have a <80 IQ like you do, it would be hard to tell.

>>715884742 (OP)
It's a weird message to put in a childrens game. "yes little bobby (age 8,) be like donkey man and take off your pants in front of our tablet with cameras that are always watching."

>>715891921
The guy at the youtube comment is probably joking, yes.

The people supporting it in this thread and wanting "society" to have a "rational discussion" about "children's sexuality" are probably not joking, considering how much loli spam and actual cp spam we have in this board. You would know this if you were not a tourist.

>>715891662
There isn't anything wrong about being naked, and no one should be ashamed of their own bodies, but a very young girl doing so in a public setting unless it's a very controlled and protected environment (like a nudist colony, or changing room) would be very dangerous for them.

Being cautious for your own safety, particularly as a developing child isn't being ashamed of your body. It's common sense. Pauline likes her body, and she sure as hell isn't showing it to you, perv.

>>715891921
joking?

>>715884770
please share more

>>715884770
Topless children are out.
Bottomless children are in.

>>715884742 (OP)
He’s a wild animal

>>715892005
Do not entertain them with an argument. You are giving them exactly what they want.

>>715891994
ft. a little redditor freak who would have a stroke at a pedobear joke from 2012.

>>715892021
you can't do that it's against the laws

>>715892094
I've been here before you were even born

>>715892005
>would be very dangerous for them.
What's the danger? Giving a random pedophile passing by a boner?

>>715892098
its ok
he makes the laws.

>>715892175
You're assuming all pedophiles are the socially awkward "harmless" ones on here.

Some of them are calculating, sinister people who would target, kidnap and hurt them without any remorse whatsoever, providing they get away with it.

>>715892094
I am getting "oldfag claim" fatigue.
They always type like little kids and their unintelligent babble always conveniently lines up with the soft moral sensibilities of the latest twitter zeitgeist.

>>715885647
>but there is virtually not a single platform left where you can talk about it in earnest

The fact you question this says a lot about you...

>>715892098
>>715892021
How do you refute THIS?

>>715892476
Sounds like he just wishes he could be a good dad.

>>715892335
How does being naked come into the equation?

>>715892345
i've had this fatigue since it became cool to proclaim to be an oldfag when it used to be an accusation of being a no-life loser who hung around all day on /b/ circa 2008 or so.

then some election tourists decided "Yeah, it would be cool to claim that I spent the last decade on this shithole full of stuff I hate! maybe in the next ten years I can change it to be just like my home the_donald" and here we are nine years later and the transformation is almost complete.

>>715892345
People are growing up. Deal with it, incel. We can't have dark humor while there are actual freaks like you riding along because you feel you are in good company

>>715892598
It fuels those people's desires.

It's why parents are encouraged to stop their kids sexualizing themselves until they're old enough to identify danger and get help if the need arises.

>>715885481
I really want to tell those people using the crying emojis the reputation it has...

>>715892575
>good dad
haha..
yeah.

>>715885290
>>715884993
Let's be real, if they had a little boy the same age as Pauline in the game instead of Pauline, there would be a naked option.

>>715892754
>like they don't know
guy waving ouh flag at EVO 2021.gif

>>715891649
>A lot of the outfits are also excessively inappropriate.
Such as?

>>715892761
every woman's fantasy

>>715892598
Everybody knows clothing is natural pedo repellent.
>>715892754
It's the 2nd most used emoji in the world after heart.

>>715892738
>>715892889
>It fuels those people's desires.
By how much? Where did this happen? Why did we not realize until a few decades ago?
You're just setting arbitrary standards based on vibes to justify your opinion.

>>715884742 (OP)
Unironically? You cant. The only way to "refute" it is to have never written it in the first place. We'll and the fact that the depiction wouldn't be legal

Every time we have these threads it becomes clear that 99% of terminally online losers have never been to a beach before saying shit like >>715892738

It's like /v/ is filled with islamist fundie muslims.

>>715892987
A lot. Everywhere, kids were generally fully covered up until a few decades ago but nowadays they have more freedom of expression and that does absolutely include revealing clothing, which are generally sold to them and worn through social pressures.

This is going to go on forever, isn't it?

>>715892738
It's summer in the northern hemisphere.
If you live near any body of water, go outside right now and touch sand. Then come back here and realize how retarded your statement was.

>>715893182
>Everywhere, kids were generally fully covered up until a few decades ago
tf are you on, when my grandparents were kids it was generally accepted for boys to swim naked almost anywhere. (france btw)

>>715893095
Kids in bathing suits on a beach is different because it's a safe environment. Sure there are a few (you)'s oogling them at a distance but they're with adults and surrounded by sane people.

>>715893182
>kids were generally fully covered up until a few decades ago
No they fucking weren't lol, you can watch films from the 1980s where kids run around butt-naked.

>>715893086
What law is being violated?

>>715893353
>Kids in bathing suits on a beach is different because it's a safe environment.
>the fucking beach is a safe environment
what the fuck am I reading

>>715893346
France is an exception and you know it.

>>715893353
>DK Bananza is a dangerous environment!!!
I see.

>>715893420
ADHD strikes again. Read the other half.

>>715893425
No? My parents had the same thing growing up in California.
You can look at old videos of Woodstock from the 60's and 70's and see that you're full of it. What, is that an exception too?

>>715893492
The other half is "My insane schizobabble from the first half is wrong but it's right ok????"

I think you just need to accept you're not a normal person and other people don't think of this as much of a big deal as you do. In fact they probably don't think about it at all and that's the actual normal stance to have.

Honestly I'm just derailing the thread.

>>715893664
Doing what?

Fapping, mostly and drinking beer.

>>715884742 (OP)
I always have the urge to be "that guy" when such an opportunity presents itself but rare do I come across a community where I don't care about being banned enough to not pull the trigger purely for the reactions.

The original question was fundamentally stupid. Might as well have fun with it.

>>715893495
This. When my father was a kid it was required that boys swam naked at the YMCA, it wasn't an option. Modern society is so prudish compared to the 20th century.

>>715893891
Ah yes, YMCA, the gay grooming song

>>715893664
based

>>715894068
did you know the YMCA sued and almost won against the village people for that exact reason?
https://americansongwriter.com/theres-a-place-you-cant-go-on-this-day-ymca-sued-y-m-c-a-group-village-people/
They didn't want their family-friendly summer camp organization to be associated with a bunch of faggots playing dress-up and singing how great it is to eye young men in the showers.

>>715893383
Whether it's a country's federal law, or Nintendo's own rules and regulations they have to follow, it simply won't fly, even if not pornographic in nature.

OK, serious answer to the stupid OP question.

The statement is true, being naked isn't something to be ashamed of. Pauline doesn't have a nude option because media can't depict naked children by law, and if it did, it would simply be to cater to pedophiles. Big stupid monke's can, and DK is typically nude anyway, just with a tie, which was the joke.

>>715894231
relaly the problem is that faggots became normalized
If faggots were considered an immoral sex pest scourge then there would be no problem at all.

>>715889285
>f**t
f'cnt?

>>715884770
fpbp

>>715884742 (OP)
>Customization for DK
>But No hats,
>No gloves,
>Not even a rare retro skin,
>"But that bubble gum fur, though"
His fur looks like papier-mâché, too

>>715885647
God tier bait but the actual issue is
>sexuality
>intelligent discourse
take the pedo shit away for a second and consider the rest of the statement.
what discourse? there's nothing to discuss.
I hope you make a friend one day and stop fishing for (You)s

>>715884742 (OP)
Test, also fuck the mods for banning me for cunny posts while also allowing cunny threads

How can one man be so based.?