>AMD can't do raytrac-
What was that?

>frame gen
>xess balanced
>ray traced lighting off
>path tracing no
AMD can't do raytracing

>>715999824 (OP)
>path tracing: No

>>716000224
That's a cute Becca

>>716000293
She's cute by default

>>715999824 (OP)
>gay generation: Yes
>Doesn't even use FSR4
Is this elaborate bait?

>>716000224
>>716000775
flatter

>>716002679

I have a 5070ti and between nvidia's framegen and AMD's framegen I actually prefer AMD's implementation. There's in fact less artifacts and interpolation issues. Also runs faster since AMD's FG isn't bogged down with useless ai processing.
I was quite disappointed seeing this. Nvidia doesn't even have a latency advantage since you can inject reflex manually for AMD framegen anyway (on an nvidia GPU, I guess on AMD cards you can't do that and that makes using FG on them impossible)

>>715999824 (OP)
>2020 game runs on top of the line AMD rig (act surprised)
>half rt features turned off
>benchmark which points to the ground skewing the averages in op's favor
>probably some optimized rt mod to skew the results even further
wow. zased.

>>716003247
>Nvidia doesn't even have a latency advantage
>inject reflex manually
>AMD's implementation there's in fact less artifacts and interpolation issues
ur doing something wrong once again. stop using external limiters and reflex injectors when using framegen, they are the reason why ur experience is bad. but if u wont listen thats how its gonna be.

>>716004007
I tried nvidia FG without external shit though. It will normally handle reflex automatically and I can feel that it does. It's AMD's framegen that will need external Reflex injection. It's AMD's FG that is a bad experience without this trick in term of lag, Nvidia's feels great, but it looks actually worse.

>>715999824 (OP)
>no rt lighting
>path tracing off
lol you're not even turning on the options that matter.
>Also no ray reconstruction
So even if performance was there it would be 10x worse than on any Nvidia card
>no framegen that actually works let alone mfg

>>716003247
>also runs faster
The line that gave away you don't actually have a 5070ti. The performance hit from fsr is like 20%+, on dlss it's virtually 0

>>716005059
Yea, you are clueless.
Both FG have around 20% performance hit, so it doesn't really matter which one you are using in that regard.

>>716005336
>Both FG have around 20% performance hit,
On dlss it's under 5%/usually more like nothing. I'm going to be back to this thread in 10 minutes with screenshots, you better be ready for rape.

>>716005671
Sure.
Meanwhile I'll tell you to check if you aren't heavy CPU limited before you start using FG to prove it.

>>716000224
not even a 5090 can run path tracing without goyframes and fake resolution anon

>>715999824 (OP)
Your image is so dark it’s unreadable, that does not bode well for the rest of your idiotic post.

>>715999824 (OP)
>Super res balanced
>ray traced lighting off
>path tracing off

What's with this blind hate for AMD? People don't see that Nvidia is funding many bullshits we complain about?

>>716006834
Stockholm syndrome, this happens every time nV announces another proprietary technology.

>>715999824 (OP)
Do AMDcucks really post screenshots of their game settings as proof? How does it look in-game?

>>716006834
That would only matter if they were comparable products, but they are not.

My display is 144hz.
Can I frame limit to 60fps then frame gen up to 120 and keep it there? My refresh rate reports 144hz when I do this.

>>716005763
>check if you aren't heavy CPU limited
Gpu utilization basically stuck at 98%-100% in both
Here's frame gen off

>>716005763
>>716007530
And here's framegen on with x4 forced in app, 0 (real) difference in performance.
>latency
You aren't going to feel the difference between like 35 and 40ms, which with just a spot check seems like the type of difference you'll be seeing.
>>716007381
You can't use a frame rate limiter, it for whatever reason jacks up latency. Even if it's a number like 300 it'll be basically unplayable. Reflex is supposed to cap the framerate but for me it for whatever reason only works like half the time.

>>716008005
>>716007530
Why don't you simply hop into the game and show the overlay? Because your testing is certainly flawed something doesn't add up. FG isn't free.
Is it because of super low resolution?

>>716007530
>>716008005
Here's op settings but everything else on ultra + dlss instead. I'm assuming he has a mod or a few settings turned down or something.
>>716009024
I couldn't figure out how to get the nvidia overlay to show and I'm not taking a video or something.
It isn't free I guess but your screenshot insinuates on the 5090 it's a 15% hit (or something I can't do math in my head) to performance in alan wake at least, which I don't see any real proof of, feel like my testing method is at minimum comparable to just assuming that because 4x isn't really 4x it must mean there's a decent performance hit. Maybe the performance of fg is limited by the tensor cores or whatever part of the gpu does that calculation

>super low resolution
Yeah it's 1080p dlssQ but that's in the screenshots

>>716005891
And OP is using both anyway

>>716010324
Yeah, overlays are a pain to capture sometimes.
performance hit with both upscaling and frame gen enabled at the same time is bigger than with just FG.
4090, 5090 doesn't matter. But if it was only tensors, lower end GPUs would drop more frames in the result.

>>715999824 (OP)
Why are you using XeSS? If FSR 4 is so buggy, just use Optiscaler to hook DLSS.

>>716004890
For free.

>>716011818
Not if you own Nvidia stock

>>715999824 (OP)
>98 fps with frame gen
Lol. It would look better honestly if you didn't turn that on. Looks extra desperate to justify your 9070xt purchase to random anons on /v/ desu.

>>716011495
>AMD hardware
>Hook DLSS