all this will do is reduce the types of games being made. you'll have fewer options for games.

>>716017349 (OP)
I'm not enoigh of a zoomer to keep up with this gay ass shit but If youre still playing new games then you deserve even worse.

>we'll have less slop
Oh no

Less slop is good
Its got my vote

>>716017349 (OP)
>less live service garbage
Exactly what I wanted

Good I hate video games.

>entire """"movement""" is schizos gatekeeping videogames genres under the guise of virtuous consumer protection crusader
cringe and gay

>>716017787
We don't sign our posts here.

>>716017349 (OP)
No it won't. If a corporation and or industry tells you they can't do something. The answer is they totally can but it would require them to stop making 1% more money for a few years.
Everytime a industry whined and fought back against people wanting shit to change and claimed nothing could be done. The industry was forced to change and suddenly what was "impossible" was suddenly not only possible but incredibly easy. Take a look at Seat belts for cars for instance. Many claims about adding them to all cars as a requirement was bitched about by the automotive industry. Claim it's "impossible" and would ruin the industry forever. Then when it was made mandatory suddenly every car had seatbelts and not a single fucking manufacturer remotely had an issue.

If they say it's "impossible" what they mean to say is it's not profitable.

>>716017349 (OP)
Good. Then we'll go back to the way video games used to be with single player games not requiring an always online connection and players having their own dedicated servers