>>716038207>But if you didn't know....video games were always gay and wokeOh please. There's a significant difference between gay characters existing and constantly shoving the agenda in your face. For DAV it's clearly the latter.
It's like saying
>games have always been political!!Yeah, no fucking shit, but the question is which one takes focus? Which one takes priority?
Is the gay person a part of the world or is the story built around the gay character simply because he's gay?
Did the developers intend to tell a story first and foremost or did they want to spread whatever agenda they believe at the moment and video games are just a tool to use for their goal?
Take for example Black Sails (the series about pirates). There's a gay main character in there and it's amazing because his sexuality had its consequences in an age where it wasn't normal. It's why he was (indirectly) ostracized from society, it's why he had to flee and it's why he became a fearsome pirate. It's also almost never brought up, he's not bragging about it at all.
Compare this to Veilguard, the characters talk about their conditions or beliefs constantly and they berate anyone who thinks otherwise.
It's also ridiculously dumb at times.
I'm talking about the dragon conversation.
>What? Who doesn't like dragons?is such a ridiculous sentence that only people with genuinely zero empathy can grasp.
Dragons in this world aren't majestic mythological creatures like in our world, they are threats who burn down villages and massacre entire populations.
People wouldn't develop the same interest in dragons in that world as they would here and straight up asking
>who doesn't like rampaging and feral serial killers?is severe autism at best and sociopathic behavior at worst